Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - GSIC Challenge - Doc Gaw 09:47:33 07/06/05 (86)

• Re: GSIC Challenge - Jim Willis 10:56:47 07/06/05 (33)
• intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 11:15:33 07/06/05 (31)
• Re: intelligent chip - Jim Willis 12:07:53 07/06/05 (22)
• I hope he gets a bag of chips - Ken Perkins 12:26:47 07/06/05 (5)
• Seems like SPAM to me! - PleaseHelpMe 14:32:05 07/06/05 (4)
• SPAM ?? - No - DESPERATION ! ! ! (sad!) - Mike Mount 16:16:20 07/06/05 (3)
• And you by contrast? nt - Norm 17:19:07 07/06/05 (2)
• And ME by contrast? Have TRULY great gear! . . .wouldn't bother with IC! - Mike Mount 07:05:38 07/07/05 (1)
• Why are you so defensive? nt - Norm 15:06:02 07/08/05 (0)
• Re: intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 13:07:03 07/06/05 (15)
• "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - clarkjohnsen 13:19:29 07/06/05 (13)
• Re: "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - Jim Willis 15:33:06 07/06/05 (12)
• No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 16:20:46 07/06/05 (11)
• Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - tom otis 17:01:16 07/06/05 (9)
• Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 17:17:43 07/06/05 (8)
• magic beans - Par Time Punk 17:26:54 07/06/05 (7)
• You must demonstrate that the work first. - Norm 20:27:12 07/06/05 (6)
• wrong - Par Time Punk 01:18:24 07/07/05 (5)
• Sorry there is no logic here. nt - Norm 06:10:25 07/07/05 (4)
• And no heart, no respect, no ear... no nuthin'! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:26:05 07/07/05 (3)
• on the contrary - Par Time Punk 09:23:13 07/07/05 (2)
• Sorry there is no logic here, only a wilful disregard for the natural world. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:04 07/07/05 (0)
• i agree - Par Time Punk 12:52:28 07/07/05 (0)
• Re: Of course!. - Jim Willis 18:09:48 07/06/05 (0)
• bebitko@yahoo.com´s posts in Audio Asylum: 2, both in this thread... Coincidence? (nt) - orejones 04:51:44 07/07/05 (0)
• Wow! And here I thought that it only worked on audio CDs! - Bruce from DC 12:21:55 07/06/05 (5)
• Re: Not to mention... - Jim Willis 15:34:57 07/06/05 (4)
• Do yuh think if I put on my computer - Bruce from DC 15:44:07 07/06/05 (2)
• Re: Do yuh think if I put on my computer - aggielaw 18:37:55 07/06/05 (0)
• Beware of Shakespeare, Bruce! He said some nasty things about lawyers... (nt) - orejones 04:47:45 07/07/05 (0)
• If you emphasize that last point..... - JimL 21:19:11 07/06/05 (0)
• Why do you think it is safe to use? - Al Sekela 12:35:24 07/06/05 (1)
• Safe to use?? - Mike Mount 19:18:34 07/06/05 (0)
• My claim at JREF was rejected... - Wellfed 14:39:56 07/06/05 (0)
• The letter was sent to you. We should care because...?(nt) - soulfood 11:49:08 07/06/05 (0)
• Has any IC believer put their money where their mouth is? - Caymus 13:08:43 07/06/05 (38)
• I have been vaguely aware of the challenge but suspected it was like the Nigerian scam. - Norm 14:21:28 07/06/05 (3)
• every optomtetrist in the world uses difference/no difference and it seems to work. - Jake_LA 14:46:10 07/06/05 (2)
• Optometrists can’t test the mind of those who claim to see Ghosts and Fairies - Caymus 15:10:44 07/06/05 (0)
• My optometrist asks which is better this or this. - Norm 16:23:49 07/06/05 (0)
• I have no intention on treating my entire collection... - Wellfed 14:35:04 07/06/05 (33)
• Wellfed, I'm curious, what were the main points of contention with regards to the test protocol at JREF?[nt] - Steve Cortez 14:47:09 07/06/05 (2)
• Steve, I'll probably have to get back to you early next week... - Wellfed 16:49:32 07/06/05 (0)
• Steve, here is one of my posts at the JREF Forum that summarizes my view on the protocol matter... - Wellfed 16:17:48 07/07/05 (0)
• meaning it must follow scientific protocols-so forget about it - uncle mag 18:46:05 07/06/05 (29)
• I’m sure the psychics would easily get that $1M if Randi let THEM set the protocols - Caymus 19:20:07 07/06/05 (28)
• They clearly indicate in their FAQ that the protocol... - Wellfed 21:18:35 07/06/05 (27)
• “Mutually agreed” does not mean YOU set the parameters - Caymus 22:26:00 07/06/05 (26)
• He doesn't understand that - Ken Perkins 05:26:35 07/07/05 (24)
• OK Ken, if you have such a firm grasp... - Wellfed 11:14:55 07/07/05 (21)
• You got it... - Ken Perkins 11:30:01 07/07/05 (18)
• All I can say.. - Wellfed 12:29:55 07/07/05 (17)
• Re: All I can say.. - Ken Perkins 12:45:15 07/07/05 (16)
• Ken, with all due respect... - Wellfed 13:01:14 07/07/05 (15)
• For the last time - Ken Perkins 13:34:18 07/07/05 (14)
• I viewed Kramer's lying... - Wellfed 14:14:29 07/07/05 (13)
• You know what? - Ken Perkins 14:51:03 07/07/05 (12)
• Eerily reminiscent actually... - Wellfed 15:48:36 07/07/05 (11)
• Thanks for those gentlemanly responses to the witless. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:16:39 07/08/05 (4)
• Hey, I happen to like Ken... - Wellfed 15:44:42 07/08/05 (3)
• I wuv ooh too...... - Ken Perkins 16:34:28 07/08/05 (1)
• It's tough for me to let it go at that... - Wellfed 20:44:28 07/08/05 (0)
• I wasn't thinking just about him. But in fact he's been lots ruder to me, than to you. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:14:44 07/09/05 (0)
• Thanks for the suggestion - Ken Perkins 10:28:06 07/08/05 (5)
• Did you play it last night? [nt] - Wellfed 12:10:29 07/08/05 (4)
• Re: Did you play it last night? [nt] - Ken Perkins 12:17:45 07/08/05 (3)
• I don't have a TT at the moment... - Wellfed 12:27:07 07/08/05 (2)
• NO turntable??? - Ken Perkins 12:47:56 07/08/05 (1)
• What would you expect ... - Wellfed 14:13:22 07/08/05 (0)
• Agreed, Kramer comes across as a right p**** - clifff 12:09:49 07/07/05 (1)
• I was beginning to consider the negotiations a waste of my time... - Wellfed 12:42:04 07/07/05 (0)
• That is EXACTLY how I read it - clifff 11:16:24 07/07/05 (1)
• I found that the stress induced by JREF misbehavior had a definite impact... - Wellfed 12:50:27 07/07/05 (0)
• I would have been tested if the "Challenge" was real [nt] - Wellfed 06:03:52 07/08/05 (0)
• Missing reference to your article -- here - clarkjohnsen 13:51:54 07/06/05 (2)
• A pupil´s laudation of his master..., and conveniently pointing to some thorny matters... - orejones 04:56:06 07/07/05 (1)
• Reviews and posts being channelled through a guru...what's next?(nt) - soulfood 05:17:40 07/07/05 (0)
• Moderators Please!!!! This belongs in Prop Head Plaza... - SF tech 18:39:15 07/06/05 (8)
• No, it does not. - jneutron 09:24:57 07/07/05 (7)
• No, it does not. - DITTO! Why hide facts? - Mike Mount 11:47:03 07/07/05 (6)
• Have you tried one? nt - gme109 19:21:08 07/07/05 (5)
• Burden of proof. - Pat D 11:54:30 08/23/05 (0)
• Would you try a layer of jello on your CD? - clifff 03:48:40 07/08/05 (2)
• So you have a closed mind, now go back to sleep. nt - gme109 07:47:09 07/08/05 (1)
• Answer the question. - clifff 15:58:47 07/08/05 (0)
• Hell NO! wouldn't bother with - make believe stuff . . . - Mike Mount 09:27:58 07/08/05 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: GSIC Challenge - Jim Willis 10:56:47 07/06/05 (33)
• intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 11:15:33 07/06/05 (31)
• Re: intelligent chip - Jim Willis 12:07:53 07/06/05 (22)
• I hope he gets a bag of chips - Ken Perkins 12:26:47 07/06/05 (5)
• Seems like SPAM to me! - PleaseHelpMe 14:32:05 07/06/05 (4)
• SPAM ?? - No - DESPERATION ! ! ! (sad!) - Mike Mount 16:16:20 07/06/05 (3)
• And you by contrast? nt - Norm 17:19:07 07/06/05 (2)
• And ME by contrast? Have TRULY great gear! . . .wouldn't bother with IC! - Mike Mount 07:05:38 07/07/05 (1)
• Why are you so defensive? nt - Norm 15:06:02 07/08/05 (0)
• Re: intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 13:07:03 07/06/05 (15)
• "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - clarkjohnsen 13:19:29 07/06/05 (13)
• Re: "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - Jim Willis 15:33:06 07/06/05 (12)
• No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 16:20:46 07/06/05 (11)
• Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - tom otis 17:01:16 07/06/05 (9)
• Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 17:17:43 07/06/05 (8)
• magic beans - Par Time Punk 17:26:54 07/06/05 (7)
• You must demonstrate that the work first. - Norm 20:27:12 07/06/05 (6)
• wrong - Par Time Punk 01:18:24 07/07/05 (5)
• Sorry there is no logic here. nt - Norm 06:10:25 07/07/05 (4)
• And no heart, no respect, no ear... no nuthin'! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:26:05 07/07/05 (3)
• on the contrary - Par Time Punk 09:23:13 07/07/05 (2)
• Sorry there is no logic here, only a wilful disregard for the natural world. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:04 07/07/05 (0)
• i agree - Par Time Punk 12:52:28 07/07/05 (0)
• Re: Of course!. - Jim Willis 18:09:48 07/06/05 (0)
• bebitko@yahoo.com´s posts in Audio Asylum: 2, both in this thread... Coincidence? (nt) - orejones 04:51:44 07/07/05 (0)
• Wow! And here I thought that it only worked on audio CDs! - Bruce from DC 12:21:55 07/06/05 (5)
• Re: Not to mention... - Jim Willis 15:34:57 07/06/05 (4)
• Do yuh think if I put on my computer - Bruce from DC 15:44:07 07/06/05 (2)
• Re: Do yuh think if I put on my computer - aggielaw 18:37:55 07/06/05 (0)
• Beware of Shakespeare, Bruce! He said some nasty things about lawyers... (nt) - orejones 04:47:45 07/07/05 (0)
• If you emphasize that last point..... - JimL 21:19:11 07/06/05 (0)
• Why do you think it is safe to use? - Al Sekela 12:35:24 07/06/05 (1)
• Safe to use?? - Mike Mount 19:18:34 07/06/05 (0)
• My claim at JREF was rejected... - Wellfed 14:39:56 07/06/05 (0)