Receivedthe following from a reader in Japan about my article at www.enjoythemusic.com about the chip. Is anybody else up for the challenge?Mr. Gaw,
My name is Kent Phillips, of Yuuki, Ibaraki, Japan. I read your May article
online in which you gave a favorable review of the GSIC. I am an incredibly
skeptical person when it comes to these things, and am a huge supporter of
the James Randi Foundation and his attempts to debunk frauds and
pseudoscience. In fact, he offers a prize of US$1,000,000 to any person that
displays abilities which cannot be explained through rational, terrestrial
means. Detecting the difference in discs treated with the GSIC and those
which are not qualifies. In two subsequent tests taking less than one day
each, if you can accurately discern between identical discs treated and
untreated, you would be given the million dollars.I am not affiliated with the organization other than reading its reports and
message boards, and I would gain nothing by you paying any attention to this
challenge. I just stumbled upon your article as I was searching for
impartial reviews of the GSIC and was intrigued to see if you could do it.You don't need to explain why or how the device works or contact the
manufacturer, and you can do the test using the location and equipment you
prefer. All you need to do is sit, listen, and complete a survey in which
your correct answers net you a million dollars.Here is more information on the challenge:
http://www.randi.org/research/faq.htmlHere is a message board thread highlighting a previous challenger who did
not test due to his own vanity but can show an idea of how the test would
take place: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=53824And here is the thread of someone else about to take the challenge. Should
this person fail (the test is in less than 2 weeks) or not test, you would
be able to do so: http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=56542If you decide to look into this, I wish you the best.
-K
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - GSIC Challenge - Doc Gaw 09:47:33 07/06/05 (86)
- Re: GSIC Challenge - Jim Willis 10:56:47 07/06/05 (33)
- intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 11:15:33 07/06/05 (31)
- Re: intelligent chip - Jim Willis 12:07:53 07/06/05 (22)
- I hope he gets a bag of chips - Ken Perkins 12:26:47 07/06/05 (5)
- Seems like SPAM to me! - PleaseHelpMe 14:32:05 07/06/05 (4)
- SPAM ?? - No - DESPERATION ! ! ! (sad!) - Mike Mount 16:16:20 07/06/05 (3)
- And you by contrast? nt - Norm 17:19:07 07/06/05 (2)
- And ME by contrast? Have TRULY great gear! . . .wouldn't bother with IC! - Mike Mount 07:05:38 07/07/05 (1)
- Why are you so defensive? nt - Norm 15:06:02 07/08/05 (0)
- Re: intelligent chip - bebitko@yahoo.com 13:07:03 07/06/05 (15)
- "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - clarkjohnsen 13:19:29 07/06/05 (13)
- Re: "I don't understand why not to try chip and see for yourself." Pretty simple, really. - Jim Willis 15:33:06 07/06/05 (12)
- No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 16:20:46 07/06/05 (11)
- Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - tom otis 17:01:16 07/06/05 (9)
- Re: No, I think there is more to the scam police activities about the IC. - Norm 17:17:43 07/06/05 (8)
- magic beans - Par Time Punk 17:26:54 07/06/05 (7)
- You must demonstrate that the work first. - Norm 20:27:12 07/06/05 (6)
- wrong - Par Time Punk 01:18:24 07/07/05 (5)
- Sorry there is no logic here. nt - Norm 06:10:25 07/07/05 (4)
- And no heart, no respect, no ear... no nuthin'! nt - clarkjohnsen 07:26:05 07/07/05 (3)
- on the contrary - Par Time Punk 09:23:13 07/07/05 (2)
- Sorry there is no logic here, only a wilful disregard for the natural world. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:04 07/07/05 (0)
- i agree - Par Time Punk 12:52:28 07/07/05 (0)
- Re: Of course!. - Jim Willis 18:09:48 07/06/05 (0)
- bebitko@yahoo.com´s posts in Audio Asylum: 2, both in this thread... Coincidence? (nt) - orejones 04:51:44 07/07/05 (0)
- Wow! And here I thought that it only worked on audio CDs! - Bruce from DC 12:21:55 07/06/05 (5)
- Re: Not to mention... - Jim Willis 15:34:57 07/06/05 (4)
- Do yuh think if I put on my computer - Bruce from DC 15:44:07 07/06/05 (2)
- Re: Do yuh think if I put on my computer - aggielaw 18:37:55 07/06/05 (0)
- Beware of Shakespeare, Bruce! He said some nasty things about lawyers... (nt) - orejones 04:47:45 07/07/05 (0)
- If you emphasize that last point..... - JimL 21:19:11 07/06/05 (0)
- Why do you think it is safe to use? - Al Sekela 12:35:24 07/06/05 (1)
- Safe to use?? - Mike Mount 19:18:34 07/06/05 (0)
- My claim at JREF was rejected... - Wellfed 14:39:56 07/06/05 (0)
- The letter was sent to you. We should care because...?(nt) - soulfood 11:49:08 07/06/05 (0)
- Has any IC believer put their money where their mouth is? - Caymus 13:08:43 07/06/05 (38)
- I have been vaguely aware of the challenge but suspected it was like the Nigerian scam. - Norm 14:21:28 07/06/05 (3)
- every optomtetrist in the world uses difference/no difference and it seems to work. - Jake_LA 14:46:10 07/06/05 (2)
- Optometrists can’t test the mind of those who claim to see Ghosts and Fairies - Caymus 15:10:44 07/06/05 (0)
- My optometrist asks which is better this or this. - Norm 16:23:49 07/06/05 (0)
- I have no intention on treating my entire collection... - Wellfed 14:35:04 07/06/05 (33)
- Wellfed, I'm curious, what were the main points of contention with regards to the test protocol at JREF?[nt] - Steve Cortez 14:47:09 07/06/05 (2)
- Steve, I'll probably have to get back to you early next week... - Wellfed 16:49:32 07/06/05 (0)
- Steve, here is one of my posts at the JREF Forum that summarizes my view on the protocol matter... - Wellfed 16:17:48 07/07/05 (0)
- meaning it must follow scientific protocols-so forget about it - uncle mag 18:46:05 07/06/05 (29)
- I’m sure the psychics would easily get that $1M if Randi let THEM set the protocols - Caymus 19:20:07 07/06/05 (28)
- They clearly indicate in their FAQ that the protocol... - Wellfed 21:18:35 07/06/05 (27)
- “Mutually agreed†does not mean YOU set the parameters - Caymus 22:26:00 07/06/05 (26)
- He doesn't understand that - Ken Perkins 05:26:35 07/07/05 (24)
- OK Ken, if you have such a firm grasp... - Wellfed 11:14:55 07/07/05 (21)
- You got it... - Ken Perkins 11:30:01 07/07/05 (18)
- All I can say.. - Wellfed 12:29:55 07/07/05 (17)
- Re: All I can say.. - Ken Perkins 12:45:15 07/07/05 (16)
- Ken, with all due respect... - Wellfed 13:01:14 07/07/05 (15)
- For the last time - Ken Perkins 13:34:18 07/07/05 (14)
- I viewed Kramer's lying... - Wellfed 14:14:29 07/07/05 (13)
- You know what? - Ken Perkins 14:51:03 07/07/05 (12)
- Eerily reminiscent actually... - Wellfed 15:48:36 07/07/05 (11)
- Thanks for those gentlemanly responses to the witless. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:16:39 07/08/05 (4)
- Hey, I happen to like Ken... - Wellfed 15:44:42 07/08/05 (3)
- I wuv ooh too...... - Ken Perkins 16:34:28 07/08/05 (1)
- It's tough for me to let it go at that... - Wellfed 20:44:28 07/08/05 (0)
- I wasn't thinking just about him. But in fact he's been lots ruder to me, than to you. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:14:44 07/09/05 (0)
- Thanks for the suggestion - Ken Perkins 10:28:06 07/08/05 (5)
- Did you play it last night? [nt] - Wellfed 12:10:29 07/08/05 (4)
- Re: Did you play it last night? [nt] - Ken Perkins 12:17:45 07/08/05 (3)
- I don't have a TT at the moment... - Wellfed 12:27:07 07/08/05 (2)
- NO turntable??? - Ken Perkins 12:47:56 07/08/05 (1)
- What would you expect ... - Wellfed 14:13:22 07/08/05 (0)
- Agreed, Kramer comes across as a right p**** - clifff 12:09:49 07/07/05 (1)
- I was beginning to consider the negotiations a waste of my time... - Wellfed 12:42:04 07/07/05 (0)
- That is EXACTLY how I read it - clifff 11:16:24 07/07/05 (1)
- I found that the stress induced by JREF misbehavior had a definite impact... - Wellfed 12:50:27 07/07/05 (0)
- I would have been tested if the "Challenge" was real [nt] - Wellfed 06:03:52 07/08/05 (0)
- Missing reference to your article -- here - clarkjohnsen 13:51:54 07/06/05 (2)
- A pupil´s laudation of his master..., and conveniently pointing to some thorny matters... - orejones 04:56:06 07/07/05 (1)
- Reviews and posts being channelled through a guru...what's next?(nt) - soulfood 05:17:40 07/07/05 (0)
- Moderators Please!!!! This belongs in Prop Head Plaza... - SF tech 18:39:15 07/06/05 (8)
- No, it does not. - jneutron 09:24:57 07/07/05 (7)
- No, it does not. - DITTO! Why hide facts? - Mike Mount 11:47:03 07/07/05 (6)
- Have you tried one? nt - gme109 19:21:08 07/07/05 (5)
- Burden of proof. - Pat D 11:54:30 08/23/05 (0)
- Would you try a layer of jello on your CD? - clifff 03:48:40 07/08/05 (2)
- So you have a closed mind, now go back to sleep. nt - gme109 07:47:09 07/08/05 (1)
- Answer the question. - clifff 15:58:47 07/08/05 (0)
- Hell NO! wouldn't bother with - make believe stuff . . . - Mike Mount 09:27:58 07/08/05 (0)