|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. posted by John Atkinson on February 19, 2007 at 14:50:02:
I don't believe I have ever posted anything remotely resembling an accusation of unethical or dishonest behavior at S'phile. I disagree with some of your policies but I've never claimed you were dishonest or shady.I asked "Can Charles or anyone from S'phile even state with certainty that no action -- other than reimbursing the cable manufacturer -- was taken by the mag the reviewer works(ed) for?"
So far neither you, Charles, nor anyone else seems to know. If the guy has already been fired then what reason is there to besmurch the mag? If he isn't fired I'd like to hear the rationale for that before I conclude the mag's ethics are egregiously lacking -- which may *be* my conclusion in the end. Do you know that in fact no action will be taken by the mag the reviewer works for?
I would have said the same things were it S'phile, and fail to see a double standard.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Rick W 21:32:25 02/19/07 (6)
- Re: Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Charles Hansen 06:57:09 02/20/07 (5)
- Shouldn't Roosevelt have been impeached for jailing our Japanese citizens? (Off topic...) nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:17 02/20/07 (3)
- Re: Good Coulterism, Clark. [nt] - alan m. kafton 17:05:10 02/20/07 (0)
- Roosevelt ... - Jim Austin 13:30:36 02/20/07 (1)
- A popular method of avoiding Justice! E.g. - bjh 17:57:38 02/20/07 (0)
- Doesn't sound good, but I'll wait a bit to see if strong action is taken. - Rick W 08:59:08 02/20/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
