In Reply to: Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. posted by Srajan Ebaen on February 19, 2007 at 02:06:30:
>If someone associated with your company was guilty of misconduct,
>you'd reprimand that individual or sack him and then do what was in
>your power to rectify the damage, because it's the right thing to
>do and because your company's reputation hinges on it.
You addressed this to Charlie, Srajan, but I have a relevant comment
to make. Many years ago, I found out quite by accident that one of my
reviewers had worked out a deal with a manufacturer whose product he
had reviewed so that he could purchase that product. He would
demonstrate the product in his home and for every sale that resulted,
he would receive a commission that would go against the money he still
owed on the purchase.
This behavior didn't affect the review or the magazine, as it occurred
after the event. Nevertheless, the next day, I terminated that
reviewer's relationship with Stereophile, and that is what I would
have done had the reviewer in question in the cable case worked for
me -- if he did what he has been accused of. He has gone on record as
saying that it wasn't him who sold the cables but a friend to whom he
had loaned them. I was also told at the recent CES that the publisher
has since reimbursed the cable manufacturer for the cost of the cables.
A magazine relies on mutual trust between editor and writers and
between itself and its readers. Questionable behavior puts both those
relationships at risk.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - John Atkinson 05:10:42 02/19/07 (27)
- Quite right - David W. Robinson 14:29:55 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - Srajan Ebaen 06:05:24 02/19/07 (25)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - Charles Hansen 10:02:33 02/19/07 (6)
- Litigation is the name of the game these days, so that takes public - Bruce Kendall 14:17:16 02/19/07 (0)
- I agree... - mkuller 10:15:28 02/19/07 (4)
- Re: I agree... - Charles Hansen 10:20:27 02/19/07 (3)
- There was, as I recall, more going on there than a bit of photography. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:00 02/20/07 (0)
- And... - mkuller 13:04:16 02/19/07 (0)
- He's the only one I recall...(nt) - mkuller 11:36:27 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - TomLarson 07:51:16 02/19/07 (17)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - newyorkp7 07:58:05 02/19/07 (16)
- Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - Rick W 08:58:19 02/19/07 (14)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - John Atkinson 14:50:02 02/19/07 (12)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - newyorkp7 06:35:43 02/20/07 (2)
- Re: Naming names.... - alan m. kafton 13:32:21 02/20/07 (1)
- If police have a "blue wall", - mt10425 12:05:12 03/06/07 (0)
- Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Rick W 21:32:25 02/19/07 (6)
- Re: Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Charles Hansen 06:57:09 02/20/07 (5)
- Shouldn't Roosevelt have been impeached for jailing our Japanese citizens? (Off topic...) nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:17 02/20/07 (3)
- Re: Good Coulterism, Clark. [nt] - alan m. kafton 17:05:10 02/20/07 (0)
- Roosevelt ... - Jim Austin 13:30:36 02/20/07 (1)
- A popular method of avoiding Justice! E.g. - bjh 17:57:38 02/20/07 (0)
- Doesn't sound good, but I'll wait a bit to see if strong action is taken. - Rick W 08:59:08 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - TomLarson 16:33:56 02/19/07 (0)
- Please! - bjh 15:38:16 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - TomLarson 09:09:34 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - TomLarson 08:09:56 02/19/07 (0)