In Reply to: Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. posted by John Atkinson on February 19, 2007 at 05:10:42:
I concur wholeheartedly, John. Trust is the commodity necessary to even run a publication where contributors don't work out of a common office in plain sight of the boss. With trust comes the potential for abuse, either deliberately or because of misunderstandings or lower standards by the person thinking (or pretending) he's still on the straight and narrow.The only issue -- or question, really -- I had with Charles' stance was that, *without further information*, it sounded as though the organization was negligent to follow up when the story broke. Your information now suggests that the publisher has made repairs from his end. That at least is encouraging.
Truly, all of us in this field are open to this potential type of abuse. The only thing we can do is to install a no-tolerance policy, make sure our staff is informed to the letter and all its implications and terminate offenders when we find out about transgressions. That's the most troublesome aspect - finding out about it when ill-meaning individuals will work through 3rd or fourth parties and other means to disguise their actions and hide their involvement.
Thanks for throwing this bit of additional info into this thread, John. It dissolves a bit the very uneasy feeling that even the management of a high profile outfit was confused about what the right thing was to do in the wake of the event. Shit, unfortunately, happens from time to time. How quickly and comprehensively one cleans it up then becomes the operative challenge.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - Srajan Ebaen 06:05:24 02/19/07 (25)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - Charles Hansen 10:02:33 02/19/07 (6)
- Litigation is the name of the game these days, so that takes public - Bruce Kendall 14:17:16 02/19/07 (0)
- I agree... - mkuller 10:15:28 02/19/07 (4)
- Re: I agree... - Charles Hansen 10:20:27 02/19/07 (3)
- There was, as I recall, more going on there than a bit of photography. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:17:00 02/20/07 (0)
- And... - mkuller 13:04:16 02/19/07 (0)
- He's the only one I recall...(nt) - mkuller 11:36:27 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - TomLarson 07:51:16 02/19/07 (17)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - newyorkp7 07:58:05 02/19/07 (16)
- Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - Rick W 08:58:19 02/19/07 (14)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - John Atkinson 14:50:02 02/19/07 (12)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - newyorkp7 06:35:43 02/20/07 (2)
- Re: Naming names.... - alan m. kafton 13:32:21 02/20/07 (1)
- If police have a "blue wall", - mt10425 12:05:12 03/06/07 (0)
- Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Rick W 21:32:25 02/19/07 (6)
- Re: Hmm. You talkin' to me? - Charles Hansen 06:57:09 02/20/07 (5)
- Shouldn't Roosevelt have been impeached for jailing our Japanese citizens? (Off topic...) nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:17 02/20/07 (3)
- Re: Good Coulterism, Clark. [nt] - alan m. kafton 17:05:10 02/20/07 (0)
- Roosevelt ... - Jim Austin 13:30:36 02/20/07 (1)
- A popular method of avoiding Justice! E.g. - bjh 17:57:38 02/20/07 (0)
- Doesn't sound good, but I'll wait a bit to see if strong action is taken. - Rick W 08:59:08 02/20/07 (0)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - TomLarson 16:33:56 02/19/07 (0)
- Please! - bjh 15:38:16 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: Agree. Trial and conviction might be a tad premature. - TomLarson 09:09:34 02/19/07 (0)
- Re: I keep saying the same thing over and over again, but nobody seems to care. - TomLarson 08:09:56 02/19/07 (0)