|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Jitter doesn't change data. posted by Ted Smith on July 31, 2006 at 12:04:08:
No no that makes no sense at all. The clock synchronization
problem exists everywhere were digital cabling is involved.As soon as an audio source sends the data with embedded clock
to some other gadget, you have the problem of identifying
the incoming clock, sampling the values at the right time,
understanding what the other side has sent you. It works
fine with MIDI, but that may be because it deals with harmless
amounts of data compared to digital audio.By saying this should work flawlessly you admit that the whole
discussion on losing bytes because of clock skews isn't true.
You can't say A here in B in the other thread! Please!Also by saying this should work flawlessly you admit that the
choice of digital transport is irrelevant as long as it is bit
correct and the DAC is doing a good conversion, because bits
are bits, even across coax or toslink cables.So you really think bits will be bits when somebody does this
test? Well then we don't need to upgrade to HDMI after all.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- So you say the data gets to other side safely? - that's, my name 12:48:59 07/31/06 (23)
- Read more carefully - Ted Smith 13:07:05 07/31/06 (22)
- Read more carefully (me or you?) - that's, my name 13:29:20 07/31/06 (3)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - Ted Smith 13:44:07 07/31/06 (2)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - Dave Kingsland 20:25:43 07/31/06 (1)
- Re: Read more carefully (me or you?) - that's, my name 00:52:08 08/01/06 (0)
- Re: Read more carefully - that's, my name 13:25:31 07/31/06 (17)
- You are getting closer - Ted Smith 13:37:14 07/31/06 (16)
- Yes, you are starting to get my point - that's, my name 13:53:55 07/31/06 (15)
- Nope, I thought you were getting mine :) - Ted Smith 14:37:03 07/31/06 (14)
- the jitter myth unveiled (it doesn't exist if treated properly) - that's, my name 14:59:41 07/31/06 (13)
- What makes sense - Bertie_Livingston 00:37:35 08/02/06 (5)
- digital mastering and bla - that's, my name 00:55:59 08/02/06 (4)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - ehlarson 13:31:44 08/05/06 (1)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - Squonk 16:06:04 08/05/06 (0)
- Re: digital mastering and bla - Bertie_Livingston 14:03:55 08/02/06 (0)
- Some do use atomic clocks - Ted Smith 07:51:42 08/02/06 (0)
- Right ;) - Ted Smith 15:17:31 07/31/06 (6)
- Re: Right ;) - ehlarson 19:13:55 08/06/06 (1)
- Re: Right ;) - Ted Smith 20:41:16 08/06/06 (0)
- it's the microprocessor - that's, my name 00:58:28 08/01/06 (3)
- Get real. - Ted Smith 08:21:40 08/01/06 (2)
- the bit perfect DAC - that's, my name 01:12:26 08/02/06 (1)
- Good luck. We've been over this ground [nt] - Ted Smith 06:59:55 08/02/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
