|
Tube DIY Asylum Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders. |
|
|
|
Tube DIY Asylum Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Nagging question about op amps in active crossovers posted by Chris O on January 24, 2007 at 12:34:24:
Hi.Less the X-over network parts, passive or active reqardless, less signal loss (distortion) & better will be the sound. Theoretically, less speaker count inside the speaker box, more musical would be the sound - less X-over harmonic & phase distortion. Easier for an amp to drive.
Also passive is a less harmful devil than any active. Many like the sorta clinical sound of active X-over system, but no thanks for me.
The question is: music first or electronics first?
c-J
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Get a better amp then. - cheap-Jack 13:36:03 01/24/07 (7)
- Re: music first or electronics first? - danlaudionut 14:54:18 01/24/07 (6)
- A variable not available when using active crossovers - Russ57 15:10:23 01/24/07 (5)
- Re: A variable not available when using active crossovers - fatbottle 23:30:59 01/24/07 (4)
- decent measuring mic - Russ57 04:30:04 01/25/07 (3)
- Re: decent measuring mic - fatbottle 05:02:27 01/25/07 (2)
- You need more than a "decent measuring mic". - cheap-Jack 08:54:16 01/25/07 (1)
- Re: You need more than a "decent measuring mic". - fatbottle 09:12:34 01/25/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
