In Reply to: Re: They should be banished from audio! posted by Eli Duttman on January 27, 2007 at 16:11:31:
of op-amp topology of a diff amp input and global feedback to the - or + input to set gain. This was formulated in the fifties for such things as computers, power supplies, and nuclear missles. Why do they think they can apply it to music amplifiers. I'm not an EE. I'm a layperson who loves music and enjoys building my own equipment. But it seems to me IMHO that audio has been put on the back burner. Audio has been made the stepchild in the electronics world. EEs make the assumption that if an op-amp is good enough to drive a shaker table then it's "good enough" for audio. Why has it taken EEs so long to learn to design with transistors? In this lies the answer to why tube circuits command the best sound. Once the EEs who never use their ears have made their calculations proving to themselves mathematically that their design is "good enough" for audio, we audiophiles must live with it. And in some of their designs, that is indeed difficult to do for people who do use their ears. Cordially, Ray Hughes
"I take you as you are
And make of you what I will,
Skunk-bear, carcajou, bloodthirsty
Non-survivor.
Lord, let me die but not die out." THE LAST WOLVERINE by James Dickey
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Eli: Why are we holding on to this old idea.... - grhughes 08:57:09 01/28/07 (1)
- Re: Eli: Why are we holding on to this old idea.... - Eli Duttman 11:04:26 01/28/07 (0)