In Reply to: Re: Huh... posted by Rick on October 11, 2005 at 06:26:50:
Here are the specs of a cheap (and not particularly good) Philips consumer CD recorder:Frequency response - 2 Hz - 22.050 Hz
Playback S/N (A weighted) - 100 dB
Playback S/N - 100 dB
Playback dynamic range CDR - 95 (90) dB
Playback dynamic range CD - 90 dB
Playback THD CDR - 88 dB = 0.0033%
Playback THD CD - 85 dB = 0.0056%
Channel separation - 100 dB
Recording S/N (A weighted) - 98 dB
Recording S/N digital without SRC - equal to source
Recording dynamic range - 92 dB
Recording THD+S/N - 85 dB (0.0056%)
Cassette frequency response varies with most decks, but a TASCAM 122 3-head deck for instance, has a frequency response of 25-20 kHz (+/- 3 dB) with metal tape, a top S/N ratio of 80 dB (Dolby C) and wow & flutter of less than 0.04% Pretty good for a cassette deck.I looked quite a lot on the web for the specs of a higher-end Nak deck, but couldn't locate them.
Even in a very best-case scenario, I have serious doubts whether a cassette could have a 2 Hz - 22.050 Hz frequency response, a -100 dB S/N ratio, a -90 dB dynamic range, 0.0056% THD, and immeasurable wow & flutter.
And, if it's a not brand-new tape, you will get less quality than when it was new.
Saying something is intrinsically better because it is analog or better because it's digital, is a moot argument. Bob Ludwig, one of the most respected mastering engineers in the business, is a proponent of digital. Not all digital, but properly recorded digital. Both sides have their detractors and cheerleaders.
If cassette wins for you, great. Enjoy. It's all about the music.
Bob :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Actually... - soundnut 12:09:49 10/11/05 (2)
- Re: Actually... - youweirdo 00:30:52 10/12/05 (1)
- Yup. - soundnut 05:23:52 10/12/05 (0)