In Reply to: Re: Actually... posted by youweirdo on October 12, 2005 at 00:30:52:
That pretty much sums it up right there.Even though I record mostly to CD, if I had a harsh CD I wanted to warm up, recording to a good quality cassette first and then to CD would be a good way to do that.
I have a studio in my house where I record demos and personal stuff, and I still do most of my tracking on a TASCAM 238 8-track cassette recorder (It's like a double-speed TASCAM 122 with 8 tracks) and add a few tracks if necessary in the digital domain. (I also use a little of that "level pushing" you mentioned on drum tracks recorded into the TASCAM.) I think it's faster and easier to get a good sounding analog master than a good sounding digital master, and setting levels isn't as fussy. The rack that houses the recorder, the BiAmp mixing console, Alesis compressor & Nanoverb unit is big and monstrously heavy. I could free up a lot of room in my small studio by downsizing to a 16-track digital rig, but I can't bear to part with the TASCAM. It sounds terrific and is so easy to use. I've recorded stuff on it that people can't believe wasn't recorded in a commercial studio somewhere.
I'm an equal-opportunity audio guy. I like LPs, cassettes, CDs, reels, everything. It's all good.
Cheers & have a good one.
Bobbo :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yup. - soundnut 05:23:52 10/12/05 (0)