In Reply to: Re: Wrong Tree, Wrong Forrest, and the AH articles is _still_ about DF, not DA posted by john curl on May 6, 2004 at 15:18:06:
JC: ""JR, after JN's scathing and unfair attack on you, based on higher authority,""You are obviously ignoring all of his provocations and attacks. Also, you still have to understand, a difference of opinion, or questioning someone's understanding, is not an attack, nor is presenting corrections or new information..
JC: ""I found that the inductance one of the easiest and best explanations of inductance that I have ever read."
Good..have you found anything that is not in accordance with the Terman equation, as printed in 1947?
I'd be nice to provide us with new info, if you did indeed come up with some..Of course, something newer than '63 would be nice..my Kittel is '76.
JC: ""IF JN wants to discuss the subtleties of 'internal inductance' or changes in 'skin effect' at near absolute zero temperature away from the standard formula, so be it. ""
So far, the discussion of inductance I've had here with you has been the simplistic version, and in accordance with the Terman equation. And even at 1.9 Kelvin, there is no real deviation from the standard formula, although the material properties, like resistivity of copper, and permeability of iron, are far more difficult to measure. For us, we use the analysis packages that include the material properties all the way to 1.8 Kelvin. But I have not attempted to discuss work related inductance in the fashion you are attempting to 'splain.
And, I might add...you have recently learned about internal inductance (remember you were saying it didn't exist?) as it appears in the terman equation, and skin effect is absolutely, entirely about that internal inductance, and it's change..
JC: ""For reference: refer to Kittel 'Quantum Theory of Solids' Wiley 1963 pp 308-319.""
Thanks for the reference.
BTW, if you don't fully understand it, just ask..either I will know the answer, or I could find someone who does..I note with interest that you historically have never asked when you didn't understand, but the offer still stands..
Cheers, John
PS..I received one of the articles that discusses the Hawksford essex echo skin article...I cannot believe the comments about it that were committed to publication. Holy mackeral, did they ever blast him out of the water. Geeze, I would never publish those type of comments about him..
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Wrong Tree, Wrong Forrest, and the AH articles is _still_ about DF, not DA - jneutron 05:46:14 05/07/04 (0)