|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Hmmm... posted by Commuteman on May 6, 2004 at 14:03:05:
Yah...what you said...:-)A horn would have less cone movement for the same spl, so I would think less cone excursion induced jitter.
Peter: ""Maybe you guys are onto something.....(as opposed to on something)""
My vote is "on something".
As in, it's past 5 here, and I have a very important date with home depot, a spackle hawk, and a martini...not necessarily in that order. (well, yah, after home depot).
Peter: ""What happens if two different systems respond differently to that normal L-R difference by creating different amounts of timing error a la Nordmark?""
I would expect different..larger woofers would have less excursion, and wouldn't provide as much 1.2K and up content that could be jittered. Hey, is it possible Bose backed into that with the 8 rear fired baby's?
And, at low levels, since nothing is moving too far relative to the ear, there is less jittered signal, therefore the lateralization is not enhanced. Low spl auditioning is by humans who can lateralize at 20 uSec, while turning up the volume makes us hear in the 1.5 uSec realm, cause jitter is being introduced by the woof..
Den ya gots ya programs where right and left woof see different content. And, woof stuff on one side jittering only one side......
Hey, youze not the only one who can ramble..
Till tomorrow.
John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Hmmm... - jneutron 14:19:06 05/06/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
