In Reply to: logistical question before I try to answer anything else posted by Commuteman on May 4, 2004 at 15:12:43:
You are correct, I did not write that well..My statement was to show the order of things..in other words, immediately after Jon stated that ""Gene was full of BS and publishing crap"", I provided the test method that would resolve easily the question about Gene's "inductance in the way of the capacitance" statement. I did not state that either party was correct, nor incorrect, as I do not know the details of the cable or equipment used to test the capacitance..I just provided details to allow one or both to verify or refute the issue.
It was after I provided that test method that I took exception to Jon's use of the words bs and crap.
So I was (poorly) providing a timeline to show that I was simply pointing out that the invective which Jon introduced for the first time to the thread...was unwanted, and best left...on the cutting room floor..
BTW, the intent of my statement "someone has to take the high road" was aimed at Jon and Gene, that was not a statement that I was the person taking it while everybody else wasn't..It was a statement of request..
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: logistical question before I try to answer anything else - jneutron 06:08:30 05/05/04 (2)
- Ahhhhh...... - Commuteman 14:44:59 05/05/04 (1)
- Re: Ahhhhh...... - jneutron 05:58:31 05/06/04 (0)