In Reply to: Re: Yep posted by Steve Eddy on May 5, 2004 at 12:42:21:
Steve : ""Let's say the wire did delay the 12kHz info more than 1.5 uS more than it delayed the 1.2kHz information. What has that to do with inter-aural time delay?""Beats me...:-)
For an impact sound, like a cow bell or sumptin, the location of the bell's image is determined (near center stage) by the left right time delay.
IFF that time delay is different for different frequencies, that will cause the different spectral components of the image to appear to be at different locations in space, smearing of the image.
I've witnessed that when I used a (very bad), 11 band, eq on my system. The end result of my playing with that eq was a sibilance component of female vocals that was to one side of the rest of her voice..ugly, at best.
For a wire to do this, each channel would have to do that shift in different ways, to give the same effect. Or, the wire caused the amp to do such, in some as yet unknown fashion...
That implies a non linear handling of the current at different frequencies, and the channel content, being different, as causing some different shifts within each channel....
I've not seen or measured such, but at least Nordmark is implying that 20Khz Fr/phase is not looking deeply enough..
Hey...it's a start...certainly not found, maybe never. but an avenue...
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Yep - jneutron 12:58:45 05/05/04 (17)
- Re: Yep - Steve Eddy 14:22:39 05/05/04 (16)
- Remember the point of the thread.... - Commuteman 14:53:51 05/05/04 (15)
- Re: Remember the point of the thread.... - john curl 23:04:55 05/05/04 (10)
- Obviously Jung and Wurcer were just brown-nosing... - Commuteman 09:49:13 05/06/04 (8)
- Re: SY in his own speak (John Curl's wire test) - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 16:11:05 05/11/04 (6)
- Same experience as mine - Commuteman 11:28:18 05/12/04 (5)
- Re: Same experience as mine - jneutron 06:22:30 05/13/04 (4)
- Did you mean.... - Commuteman 10:28:13 05/13/04 (3)
- Re: Did you mean.... - jneutron 12:18:30 05/13/04 (2)
- Re: Did you mean.... - Granholm 14:30:25 05/13/04 (0)
- Right - Commuteman 13:43:49 05/13/04 (0)
- Re: Obviously Jung and Wurcer were just brown-nosing... - john curl 10:52:06 05/06/04 (0)
- Re: Remember the point of the thread.... - Steve Eddy 00:14:05 05/06/04 (0)
- Re: Remember the point of the thread.... - Steve Eddy 19:30:43 05/05/04 (2)
- Re: Remember the point of the thread.... - Dan Banquer 12:35:47 05/06/04 (1)
- Agreed.... - Commuteman 13:27:26 05/06/04 (0)
- Re: Remember the point of the thread.... - john curl 15:59:28 05/05/04 (0)