In Reply to: Priorities posted by Soundmind on July 4, 2006 at 06:52:34:
Our exchange is a good reminder that each individual responds differently to the strengths and weaknesses of any given system. One doesn't have to read this forum very long to have that conclusion reinforced. It is also a mistake to think someone else is wrong because their priorities are in a different order than mine. The audio traits that help spur my imagination to think that I am "there" may not work as effectively for someone else as they are better served by having their triggers in a different order.All kinda like trying to figure out another guy's taste in women... ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Priorities differ for individuals - mls-stl 09:30:36 07/04/06 (8)
- Re: Priorities differ for individuals - Tom Dawson 20:49:42 07/04/06 (0)
- Indeed - E-Stat 17:38:40 07/04/06 (0)
- Your priority is mine, but I cannot stand equalizers, or at least any that I have heard. - Norm 12:06:04 07/04/06 (5)
- It's not the equalizer that's flawed, it's the person using it. nt - Soundmind 04:44:26 07/05/06 (4)
- I guess you are right. Equalizers only adjust the frequency response within their limits. - Norm 06:27:54 07/05/06 (3)
- As difficult as properly adjusting an equalizer is Norm, relatively speaking that's the easy part - Soundmind 09:59:17 07/06/06 (2)
- More nonsense. If you don't believe as SM does you are unscientific or gullible. nt - Norm 07:51:04 07/07/06 (1)
- You claim to be involved in the "ethics of science", so where's your evidence? - real_jj 10:47:02 07/13/06 (0)