In Reply to: Re: Typical. But flawed and misleading. posted by FLZapped on January 12, 2004 at 08:12:42:
[ If you were to be able to get enough acoutic energy to impart 1.5G of impact on the cable, this would still be 400x less than what I was imparting, which would be another 52dB down, for a total of -120dBV ]If I remember correctly, the 500g was an estimate from John, which you took as gospel. Typical naysayer BS.
You don't know what the actual g force was, and anyway, it is still just another red herring on your part.
BTW, the ratio between 500 and 1.5 is 333, not 400. So your math also contains some significant errors. Just another naysayer Monday......
The bottom line is, high SPLs in the listening room can affect some cables sonically, and not others. This can be easily found by the use of sand bag damping on the really poor cables. Whether this is due to piezo/tribo electric or motor/generator, both of which have been reducto ad absurdum by the naysayers to miniscule levels, does not really matter. Nevertheless, they still move. Or don't, and sound better for it.
Jon Risch
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Typical. But flawed and misleading. - Jon Risch 20:41:18 01/12/04 (4)
- An unsupported statement, Jon - jneutron 12:32:07 01/13/04 (0)
- Re: Typical. But flawed and misleading. - Steve Eddy 21:05:36 01/12/04 (0)
- Re: Typical. But flawed and misleading. - FLZapped 23:08:49 01/12/04 (1)
- Need to stop doing this at 2am - FLZapped 04:56:48 01/13/04 (0)