Hi peter..got tired of the right hand side of my screen.Been thinking about how to calculate what's going on..
First, peltier..
Assume at time t=0, instantly pushing current through a junction.
Because delta t is zero, the peltier efficiency is at max.
As time progresses, the thermal gradient builds up, with the heat (cold) front moving away from the junction at a characteristic speed, defined by diffusivity of the metals.
As the gradient moves out and builds, the delta t across the actual junction increases, causing a decrease of the efficiency.
Eventually, the gradient at the junction will assume steady state, that being minutes, seconds, defined by the overall structure.But, at some arbitrary time, say 1 millisecond, turn off the current.
For that one milli, thermal gradient has been established..Yah, it hasn't travelled far into the materials, perhaps one to ten mils..but, energy has been stored.
Now, with the current off, the gradient across the junction is producing electricity, returning it to the current source(go with me on that, I make the assumption the drive is bipolar and able to support four quadrant operation.)Now, the efficiency of seebeck? It starts high with high gradients, and diminishes with time here, becoming zero when the gradient is gone.
But, in addition to the seebeck generation, is the material attempting to go back to uniform temperature. That would be dissipating the energy within the metals, not to be returned to the source.
Both the drive part, and the return part have non linearities.
Now, for a sine drive: during the rise of the current, peltier occurs, putting energy in. After the peak, seebeck occurs, trying to return the energy. Then, the opposite polarity does the same, albeit with the gradient reversed.
Note that energy is stored first, peak energy at peak waveform, like a cap. Then, it returns during fall, part of it anyway, again like a cap. But, while all this is going on, the materials are trying to short circuit the thermal gradient by conducting heat back across it.
As a first start, I'd use the following:
Square wave input, say 1mS..into an already established gradient across a 10 mil thick junction. That locks the efficiency and gets rid of time constants, while allowing heat capacity to be averaged, to get rise and energy delivered.
Then, Back the process out, this time using average seebeck coefficient.Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Calculation of small effects.. - jneutron 09:26:58 08/26/03 (60)
- Ok, so let's plug in the numbers I worked on yesterday - Commuteman 10:48:15 08/26/03 (58)
- Re: Ok, so let's plug in the numbers I worked on yesterday - jneutron 11:39:23 08/26/03 (57)
- I have to think this through; won't have time until late this afternoon - Commuteman 12:56:49 08/26/03 (56)
- AHA.. - jneutron 07:24:17 08/27/03 (55)
- And it just dawned on me.. - jneutron 07:49:41 08/27/03 (54)
- Rethinking this whole thing - Commuteman 09:12:55 08/27/03 (53)
- Hmmm. - jneutron 10:19:56 08/27/03 (52)
- So let's double check this..... - Commuteman 13:33:18 08/27/03 (50)
- Re: So let's double check this..... - jneutron 14:06:04 08/27/03 (49)
- that's why it seems to be disappearing into the noise.. - Commuteman 21:42:35 08/27/03 (48)
- Re: that's why it seems to be disappearing into the noise.. - jneutron 04:11:17 08/28/03 (47)
- I'm not sure I missed the point... - Commuteman 17:25:28 08/28/03 (46)
- calcs. - jneutron 04:09:38 08/29/03 (0)
- Re: I'm not sure I missed the point... - jneutron 18:43:57 08/28/03 (44)
- It goes to the other junction - Commuteman 08:46:25 08/29/03 (43)
- Re: It goes to the other junction - jneutron 08:58:31 08/29/03 (42)
- Meanwhile, back in the original discussion...... - Commuteman 13:15:41 09/03/03 (9)
- definitely.. - jneutron 14:14:47 09/03/03 (8)
- "sycophant"... - slope 12:33:44 09/04/03 (1)
- thanks..nt - jneutron 13:55:50 09/04/03 (0)
- Are they both consuming energy? - Commuteman 21:25:55 09/03/03 (5)
- Re: Are they both consuming energy? - jneutron 06:44:47 09/04/03 (4)
- Not so fast buddy..... - Commuteman 15:44:25 09/04/03 (3)
- Re: Not so fast buddy..... - jneutron 05:59:31 09/05/03 (2)
- I'm glad I'm not lifting that sheetrock, although we do need to do that kitchen... - Commuteman 09:39:05 09/05/03 (1)
- I couldn't afford the money I'd want to charge to do this stuff. - jneutron 10:18:06 09/05/03 (0)
- Re: It goes to the other junction - john curl 17:15:57 08/29/03 (31)
- Is that all you can add? Oh sure? - jneutron 17:12:10 08/31/03 (30)
- What is your problem? - Charles Hansen 19:57:17 08/31/03 (29)
- That "cheerleaders without facts" post here" - jneutron 14:09:24 09/01/03 (28)
- Wow, not only are you impolite... - Charles Hansen 14:35:13 09/01/03 (27)
- Wow...technical dialogue for a change.. - jneutron 14:53:49 09/02/03 (26)
- Oh, I forgot to add - jneutron 15:29:03 09/02/03 (0)
- I'm now placing you... - Charles Hansen 15:20:19 09/02/03 (24)
- Weak>> - robotk 04:26:39 09/03/03 (1)
- Re: Weak>> - jneutron 05:34:04 09/03/03 (0)
- Relax will ya. - Hafdef 17:53:19 09/02/03 (0)
- BFD....Personally, I think you're full of hot ayre.... - slope 15:56:02 09/02/03 (3)
- What is BFD?? - jneutron 05:31:50 09/03/03 (2)
- Re: What is BFD?? - LarryR 06:10:54 09/03/03 (1)
- Thanks Larry - jneutron 06:26:31 09/03/03 (0)
- Damn...off by about two minutes.. - jneutron 15:32:32 09/02/03 (16)
- Re: Damn...off by about two minutes.. - jon_banquer@yahoo.com 00:15:05 09/03/03 (1)
- Hi jonB - jneutron 05:53:22 09/03/03 (0)
- Re: Damn...off by about two minutes.. - john curl 00:13:38 09/03/03 (13)
- Oh Geeze, words from the cheap seats.. - jneutron 05:50:10 09/03/03 (12)
- Why do you even bother anymore? - kuribo 10:29:17 09/03/03 (10)
- How do you judge? - Commuteman 13:41:56 09/03/03 (6)
- Hmmm. - jneutron 14:58:45 09/03/03 (5)
- I'll go look for the posts, but am I wrong? - Commuteman 21:42:04 09/03/03 (4)
- btw... - jneutron 10:02:11 09/04/03 (2)
- Now that IS a pointless exercise....NT - Commuteman 10:18:09 09/04/03 (1)
- Perhaps.. - jneutron 11:09:34 09/04/03 (0)
- Re: I'll go look for the posts, but am I wrong? - jneutron 07:10:52 09/04/03 (0)
- Hi Kuribo - jneutron 11:44:52 09/03/03 (2)
- Re: Hi Kuribo - john curl 14:12:08 09/03/03 (1)
- Re: Hi Kuribo - jneutron 14:51:10 09/03/03 (0)
- Yah, I know...it's gnat, not knat...Doh!nt - jneutron 06:30:02 09/03/03 (0)
- double hmmmm. - jneutron 10:36:37 08/27/03 (0)
- Peter, I just had a good idea - jneutron 10:41:56 08/26/03 (0)