hey there John.. - jneutron - Propeller Head Plaza

hey there John..

Posted by jneutron (A) on August 23, 2005 at 13:42:49

In Reply to: Re: Ah, that is what I thought. posted by john curl on August 23, 2005 at 13:12:32:

JC: ""At what frequency, Jneutron? Is the noise?""

You wrote two sentences there, I assume you meant it to be one..

Why don't you ask the authors of the article?. I know, why don't you ask Rolf Hummell the question when you ask him to explain that text you didn't understand..

Or, better yet, why don't you calculate the noise that results from electrons that accelerate unfettered up to, say, one volt, and then hit a target? I bet the vacuum tube guys can tell ya..as vacuum tubes also have unfettered (ballistic) electron movement that terminates at a normal structure..

Of course, you are simply attempting to divert from the main issue here..you claimed the resistor has no noise...I show you what the researchers are saying, which does not support your assertion... and now you want me to tell you what the noise spectra is??? Do your homework..

JC: "" You haven't told ME anything that I don't know already.""

That is par for you..you could say nothing other than that..dogs bark...it's an ego thing for you... I wish you didn't act so silly..

JC: "" Why don't you define the effective resistance? Everyone else might need to know. ""

Perhaps you should actually read and understand the article..they show specifically what the quantum conductance is as a result of the geometry. Duh..

Ok, since you cannot understand, I'll tell you. In the abstract at the start of the paper, they state (in english) that ""the conductance of arc produced MWNT's is one unit of conductance quantum G₀ = 2e²/h = (12.9kilohms)^-1"".

And on page 1746, they discuss heating with 3mW dissipation and 6 volts..you do the math..

Rather than being so confrontational, perhaps you could take that conductance number and invert it to give us a resistivity? Or is that too much for you to handle?

Please act civil..your act does not do you justice..

Cheers, John

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Prospects for carbon fiber tecnology in electronics (audio)? - free.ranger 15:26:10 08/21/05 (20)

Re: Prospects for carbon fiber tecnology in electronics (audio)? - Jim Willis 14:59:03 08/23/05 (1)

Thanks Jim. nt - free.ranger 10:20:29 08/24/05 (0)

Nono caps should be on the way. - jensw 00:06:37 08/23/05 (13)

Re: Nono caps should be on the way. - john curl 10:22:29 08/23/05 (12)

noiseless resistors?...do you have a link to that?..nt - jneutron 11:06:40 08/23/05 (11)

Re: noiseless resistors?...do you have a link to that?..nt - john curl 12:16:10 08/23/05 (10)

Ah, that is what I thought. - jneutron 12:51:21 08/23/05 (9)

Re: Ah, that is what I thought. - john curl 13:12:32 08/23/05 (8)

Re: Ah, that is what I thought. - john curl 14:56:57 08/23/05 (6)

please stop diverting, John - jneutron 05:55:08 08/24/05 (5)

You're being silly - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 17:58:22 08/25/05 (2)

Re: You're being silly - Jacques 06:37:24 09/15/05 (0)

holy crap...that was good..:-) - jneutron 07:11:09 08/26/05 (0)

Re: please stop diverting, John - john curl 07:18:37 08/24/05 (1)

Excellent...thank you - jneutron 07:41:01 08/24/05 (0)

hey there John.. - jneutron 13:42:49 08/23/05 (0)

Re: Prospects for carbon fiber tecnology in electronics (audio)? - Steve Eddy 17:47:32 08/22/05 (2)

Re: Prospects for carbon fiber tecnology in electronics (audio)? - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 20:20:19 08/22/05 (0)

Re: - free.ranger 19:15:59 08/22/05 (0)

If it sounds exotic and costs a lot it'll be in an audio product soon -nt- - jbmcb 07:46:05 08/22/05 (0)

Follow Ups

hey there John.. - jneutron 13:42:49 08/23/05 (0)