In Reply to: If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all posted by bjh on April 8, 2007 at 11:41:41:
>why perform a test to measure something "...beyond realistic levels",
>what possible purpose would there be in that?
Considering it the equivalent of subjecting a car to lateral G on a
skid pan way in excess of what the car will experience in 99.999% of
normal use. The object is to find out where the device's limits lie.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - John Atkinson 12:18:02 04/08/07 (4)
- I guess it's a good thing - bjh 12:41:46 04/08/07 (3)
- Obviously JA didn't test the other mono because it would likely have the same failure... - vettracer 20:23:00 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Charles Hansen 14:55:11 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Mike Currie 16:26:38 04/08/07 (0)