I wasn't sure where to post this, but here goes. Ayre's MX-R amps were reviewed in the April 2007 issue of Stereophile. I just wanted to highlight a quote from Charles Hanson, in which he is discussing "beliefs that approach religious faith":"Just because I believe something doesn't make it true, and designing the MX-R taught me some lessons"
Think about that. Here's a long time, well-respected designer allowing his recent experience to challenge his 'near religious' beliefs, and then abandoning those beliefs (in certain instances) where an alternative is proven better. All I can say is, amen and hallelujah, brother Hanson. I wish there were more in the audio world that would follow in your footsteps.
As a side note, and completely unrelated to this review in any way, I have recently ordered a pair of MX-Rs. This was after hearing them in a couple of extended listening sessions driving my Sound Labs. I used tube gear for many, many years, and most recently have had Parasound's excellent JC-1s, but...the MX-Rs take things to an entirely new plane. Review on Audio Asylum to follow in a couple of months after I get their full measure. Now...can the new preamp coming out later this year displace my Blowtorch???
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 16:14:23 04/07/07 (46)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 05:46:16 04/09/07 (0)
- hehe, glad to see "scientific consensus" doesn't apply to audio! :) - danny kaey 09:40:40 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Sherlock 22:01:40 04/07/07 (0)
- Did Charles HansEn say what the lessons learned were? - andy_c 21:39:56 04/07/07 (17)
- Hi Andy - Charles Hansen 10:12:02 04/08/07 (16)
- If you are talking about the Sanken SAP series - nightdoggy 16:20:21 04/10/07 (2)
- Re: If you are talking about the Sanken SAP series - Charles Hansen 19:54:56 04/10/07 (1)
- Thanks Charles - nightdoggy 03:58:25 04/11/07 (0)
- Thanks Charles - andy_c 11:17:11 04/09/07 (12)
- Re: Thanks Charles - Charles Hansen 17:40:24 04/09/07 (11)
- Transistors' dirty little secret... - Al Sekela 12:51:40 04/10/07 (10)
- Now you've got me curious - Charles Hansen 20:06:11 04/10/07 (2)
- Re: Now you've got me curious - Ozzie 10:44:35 04/17/07 (0)
- No, it doesn't reduce capacitance, just the parasitic resistance. - Al Sekela 09:51:18 04/11/07 (0)
- Re: Tubes' dirty little secret... - Charles Hansen 19:58:20 04/10/07 (6)
- Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - tomservo 18:23:23 04/12/07 (3)
- Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - nightdoggy 04:39:38 04/13/07 (2)
- Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - morricab 02:02:25 04/17/07 (1)
- uh...everything wears out....doesn't it? nt - TomLarson 20:26:30 04/17/07 (0)
- Must be why they can sound so good! (nt) - nightdoggy 18:20:05 04/11/07 (0)
- Re: Tubes' dirty little secret... - GGA 10:12:41 04/11/07 (0)
- Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in - bjh 19:15:30 04/07/07 (20)
- No, no, no! - Charles Hansen 15:51:29 04/08/07 (3)
- Basic Lesson of Life - Larry I 08:24:54 04/09/07 (0)
- Re: No, no, no! - Mike Currie 05:43:27 04/09/07 (0)
- Re: No, no, no! - jimmycj 19:57:29 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in - Mike Currie 19:19:33 04/07/07 (15)
- So once again JA is the quality engineer... - vettracer 08:43:58 04/08/07 (9)
- Once again - Rufipennis 11:33:18 04/08/07 (7)
- who cares that an internal fuse blew? - vettracer 12:32:42 04/08/07 (1)
- If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - bjh 11:41:41 04/08/07 (5)
- Re: If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - John Atkinson 12:18:02 04/08/07 (4)
- I guess it's a good thing - bjh 12:41:46 04/08/07 (3)
- Obviously JA didn't test the other mono because it would likely have the same failure... - vettracer 20:23:00 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Charles Hansen 14:55:11 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Mike Currie 16:26:38 04/08/07 (0)
- Plus JA's measurement sections provide a slice of objectivity that shouldn't be ignored. nt - TomLarson 10:37:39 04/08/07 (0)
- I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - bjh 19:37:18 04/07/07 (4)
- Re: I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - Mike Currie 20:21:32 04/07/07 (3)
- I'm not going anywhere with it, it is what it is, if there's a problem... it's yours! nt - bjh 20:39:23 04/07/07 (2)
- No problem at all - Mike Currie 21:17:56 04/07/07 (1)
- Re: No problem at all - bjh 21:33:14 04/07/07 (0)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - TomLarson 18:13:24 04/07/07 (3)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 19:16:04 04/07/07 (2)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - john curl 21:18:29 04/07/07 (1)
- Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 05:41:07 04/09/07 (0)