Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 16:14:23 04/07/07 (46)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 05:46:16 04/09/07 (0)

hehe, glad to see "scientific consensus" doesn't apply to audio! :) - danny kaey 09:40:40 04/08/07 (0)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Sherlock 22:01:40 04/07/07 (0)

Did Charles HansEn say what the lessons learned were? - andy_c 21:39:56 04/07/07 (17)

Hi Andy - Charles Hansen 10:12:02 04/08/07 (16)

If you are talking about the Sanken SAP series - nightdoggy 16:20:21 04/10/07 (2)

Re: If you are talking about the Sanken SAP series - Charles Hansen 19:54:56 04/10/07 (1)

Thanks Charles - nightdoggy 03:58:25 04/11/07 (0)

Thanks Charles - andy_c 11:17:11 04/09/07 (12)

Re: Thanks Charles - Charles Hansen 17:40:24 04/09/07 (11)

Transistors' dirty little secret... - Al Sekela 12:51:40 04/10/07 (10)

Now you've got me curious - Charles Hansen 20:06:11 04/10/07 (2)

Re: Now you've got me curious - Ozzie 10:44:35 04/17/07 (0)

No, it doesn't reduce capacitance, just the parasitic resistance. - Al Sekela 09:51:18 04/11/07 (0)

Re: Tubes' dirty little secret... - Charles Hansen 19:58:20 04/10/07 (6)

Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - tomservo 18:23:23 04/12/07 (3)

Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - nightdoggy 04:39:38 04/13/07 (2)

Re: Tubes' dirty little secret.. (psst, they work too) - morricab 02:02:25 04/17/07 (1)

uh...everything wears out....doesn't it? nt - TomLarson 20:26:30 04/17/07 (0)

Must be why they can sound so good! (nt) - nightdoggy 18:20:05 04/11/07 (0)

Re: Tubes' dirty little secret... - GGA 10:12:41 04/11/07 (0)

Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in - bjh 19:15:30 04/07/07 (20)

No, no, no! - Charles Hansen 15:51:29 04/08/07 (3)

Basic Lesson of Life - Larry I 08:24:54 04/09/07 (0)

Re: No, no, no! - Mike Currie 05:43:27 04/09/07 (0)

Re: No, no, no! - jimmycj 19:57:29 04/08/07 (0)

Re: Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in - Mike Currie 19:19:33 04/07/07 (15)

So once again JA is the quality engineer... - vettracer 08:43:58 04/08/07 (9)

Once again - Rufipennis 11:33:18 04/08/07 (7)

who cares that an internal fuse blew? - vettracer 12:32:42 04/08/07 (1)

If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - bjh 11:41:41 04/08/07 (5)

Re: If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - John Atkinson 12:18:02 04/08/07 (4)

I guess it's a good thing - bjh 12:41:46 04/08/07 (3)

Obviously JA didn't test the other mono because it would likely have the same failure... - vettracer 20:23:00 04/08/07 (0)

Re: I guess it's a good thing - Charles Hansen 14:55:11 04/08/07 (1)

Re: I guess it's a good thing - Mike Currie 16:26:38 04/08/07 (0)

Plus JA's measurement sections provide a slice of objectivity that shouldn't be ignored. nt - TomLarson 10:37:39 04/08/07 (0)

I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - bjh 19:37:18 04/07/07 (4)

Re: I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - Mike Currie 20:21:32 04/07/07 (3)

I'm not going anywhere with it, it is what it is, if there's a problem... it's yours! nt - bjh 20:39:23 04/07/07 (2)

No problem at all - Mike Currie 21:17:56 04/07/07 (1)

Re: No problem at all - bjh 21:33:14 04/07/07 (0)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - TomLarson 18:13:24 04/07/07 (3)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 19:16:04 04/07/07 (2)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - john curl 21:18:29 04/07/07 (1)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 05:41:07 04/09/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - TomLarson 18:13:24 04/07/07 (3)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 19:16:04 04/07/07 (2)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - john curl 21:18:29 04/07/07 (1)

Re: Charles Hanson and the MX-Rs - Mike Currie 05:41:07 04/09/07 (0)

Post a Message!