![]() |
Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
Does anyone agree with me that there should be detailed descriptions of the sonic characteristics of each of the popular versions of each of the above tubes. I've read Joe's Tube Lore and a number of manufacturers web-sites which are great general direction guides but they really don't tell us what we need to know in specific and defined terms. Perhaps starting with an overall sonic characteristic like liquid, or warm, or dry or transparent then their response at the frequency extremes (since this is always an issue with tubes), then perhaps individual characteristis with say female voice, piano etc. and then imaging. We would all purchase a set of cheap base line tubes that are known for consistancy and have clearly defined caharacteristics so that comparisons could be made to this benchmark. Then use benchmark recordings. Even better if we had the same equipment best yet if we benchmarked every component in the chain but not necessary because we would be dealing in relatve values.Of course there is the question of synergy with existing equipment and the fact that we all don't hear exactly the same and so on and so forth, but again, it would all be relative. "Tube "A" has has better defined bass than the benchmark by a factor of 3 on a scale of 1-10 IMO" for instance. Of course this wouldn't be an exact science but it would give us real direction and be more useful than "this is a really great tube or this is a really, really great tube" or slavishly depending on the opinion of the tube specialty store who may be as honest as the day is long but does have to move what he has in stock. If we can bring this evaluation process closer to science we could spend less time playing this silly expensive guessing games and spend more time exploring the kind of sound we like and buying the kind of sound we want (not to mention, listening to more music) Thoughts?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc - Anacrusis 23:23:06 08/08/06 (15)
- Re: Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc - Jimmy 20:24:54 08/09/06 (1)
- Re: Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc - Anacrusis 19:52:26 08/13/06 (0)
- Gave up? - tvad 15:05:45 08/09/06 (5)
- Re: Gave up? - Anacrusis 19:46:40 08/13/06 (1)
- Moscode - tvad 22:47:45 08/14/06 (0)
- I wish we could edit these posts... - tvad 15:08:59 08/09/06 (2)
- You can delete a post... - jub_jugs 01:57:43 08/10/06 (1)
- Thanks. I didn't know that. (nt) - tvad 08:22:03 08/10/06 (0)
- Re: Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc - Sondek 07:27:11 08/09/06 (1)
- Re: Tube Characterization: 6DJ8, 6922, 7308, CCa, etc - Anacrusis 20:07:11 08/13/06 (0)
- Didn't like the answers you got in Audiogon forums?..... - Chuck Y 06:56:39 08/09/06 (1)
- Re: Didn't like the answers you got in Audiogon forums?..... - Anacrusis 20:49:37 08/13/06 (0)
- World is not as simple/straightforward as you think... - Quest 23:49:00 08/08/06 (2)
- You don't really believe this, do you? - Frihed89 03:40:54 08/09/06 (1)
- Funny as you may bring up this subject - Quest 14:15:17 08/09/06 (0)