Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Implementing Full Range drivers - hailtothevictorz 09:04:06 11/27/24 (41)

• It's a matter of definition. - Presto 15:43:01 12/09/24 (13)
• Do you consider certain large panel speakers to be "full range drivers" ? (nt - peppy m. 05:00:39 12/10/24 (12)
• RE: Do you consider certain large panel speakers to be "full range drivers" ? (nt - Presto 15:21:11 12/10/24 (11)
• Completely agree - E-Stat 18:31:52 12/11/24 (5)
• RE: Completely agree - Inmate51 07:26:33 12/12/24 (4)
• You omitted #8 - E-Stat 07:35:04 12/12/24 (3)
• RE: You omitted #8 - Inmate51 07:41:49 12/12/24 (2)
• Are you aware - E-Stat 07:46:38 12/12/24 (1)
• RE: Are you aware - Inmate51 07:55:10 12/12/24 (0)
• The Sound Lab ESL are 'full range' yet they use a crossover. - Ralph 09:21:11 12/11/24 (4)
• Actually what you find - E-Stat 16:13:51 12/11/24 (2)
• FWIW - Ralph 08:30:30 12/12/24 (1)
• Can't say but - E-Stat 08:52:02 12/12/24 (0)
• RE: The Sound Lab ESL are 'full range' yet they use a crossover. - Presto 11:24:59 12/11/24 (0)
• RE: Implementing Full Range drivers - seancuster71@gmail.com 18:40:32 12/02/24 (0)
• I've had good results with a little 4" TangBand "fullrange" . . . - Brian H P 13:38:49 12/02/24 (1)
• +1 nt - Ralph 10:53:52 12/10/24 (0)
• Sounds attractive in theory - Jon L 10:45:04 11/29/24 (1)
• RE: Sounds attractive in theory - dgaapc7 07:11:05 12/01/24 (0)
• And yet a third opinion - E-Stat 07:29:50 11/29/24 (0)
• RE: Implementing Full Range drivers - Inmate51 06:53:05 11/29/24 (18)
• RE: Implementing Full Range drivers - seancuster71@gmail.com 18:57:38 12/02/24 (17)
• Why aren't such wonderful, true "full range" drivers more popular today ? (nt - peppy m. 04:50:35 12/13/24 (1)
• RE: Why aren't such wonderful, true "full range" drivers more popular today ? (nt - seancuster71@gmail.com 02:26:14 12/15/24 (0)
• RE: Implementing Full Range drivers - Inmate51 12:08:08 12/11/24 (11)
• RE: Implementing Full Range drivers - seancuster71@gmail.com 02:02:20 12/15/24 (10)
• Re: SPC designs - Inmate51 14:44:35 12/16/24 (9)
• Re: SPC designs - seancuster71@gmail.com 19:42:53 12/17/24 (8)
• Re: SPC designs - Inmate51 20:31:43 12/17/24 (7)
• Re: SPC designs - seancuster71@gmail.com 23:12:27 12/26/24 (5)
• Re: SPC designs - Inmate51 08:23:56 12/27/24 (4)
• Re: SPC designs - seancuster71@gmail.com 13:31:00 12/27/24 (3)
• Re: SPC designs - Inmate51 09:49:47 01/01/25 (2)
• Re: SPC designs - seancuster71@gmail.com 14:15:42 01/02/25 (1)
• Re: SPC designs - Inmate51 06:20:27 01/03/25 (0)
• I agree - uncle mag 17:36:14 12/18/24 (0)
• There really isn't a Full Range driver. - Ralph 10:52:20 12/10/24 (2)
• RE: There really isn't a Full Range driver. - seancuster71@gmail.com 22:36:33 12/10/24 (1)
• No-one has ever made a Full Range driver- for real. - Ralph 09:15:59 12/11/24 (0)
• Try asking at the Hi-Eff speaker forum... - peppy m. 21:07:34 11/27/24 (0)
• The former is the more common variation of the two, AFAIK... - peppy m. 10:59:07 11/27/24 (0)

Follow Ups

• Do you consider certain large panel speakers to be "full range drivers" ? (nt - peppy m. 05:00:39 12/10/24 (12)
• RE: Do you consider certain large panel speakers to be "full range drivers" ? (nt - Presto 15:21:11 12/10/24 (11)
• Completely agree - E-Stat 18:31:52 12/11/24 (5)
• RE: Completely agree - Inmate51 07:26:33 12/12/24 (4)
• You omitted #8 - E-Stat 07:35:04 12/12/24 (3)
• RE: You omitted #8 - Inmate51 07:41:49 12/12/24 (2)
• Are you aware - E-Stat 07:46:38 12/12/24 (1)
• RE: Are you aware - Inmate51 07:55:10 12/12/24 (0)
• The Sound Lab ESL are 'full range' yet they use a crossover. - Ralph 09:21:11 12/11/24 (4)
• Actually what you find - E-Stat 16:13:51 12/11/24 (2)
• FWIW - Ralph 08:30:30 12/12/24 (1)
• Can't say but - E-Stat 08:52:02 12/12/24 (0)
• RE: The Sound Lab ESL are 'full range' yet they use a crossover. - Presto 11:24:59 12/11/24 (0)