In Reply to: 24/192 Upsampling..... posted by Todd Krieger on April 16, 2007 at 03:41:35:
Todd:I thought that the difference between synchronous and asynchronous was that:
-synchronous used a single (master) clock and either the receiver or the transmitter "slaved" to the master
-asynchronous is when receiver and master have independent clock sources, and an ASRC (asynchronous sample rate converter) was used in a PLL (Phase locked loop).So, this means that 44.1khz to 192khz can be synchronous OR asynchronous just as 44.1khz to 88.2khz can be. When resampling to even integer numbers, only 1/2 of you new sample set is "generated", where with non-even integer numbers the ENTIRE sample set is generated.
I'm pretty sure this is right. My Behringer DCX2496 has a CS8420 ACSR in a PLL - it resamples everything from 44.1 to 88.2 to 96khz Is it operating synchronously for 48khz but asynchronously for 44.1 and 88.2? Nope. It's asynchronous for ALL sample rates because it's an ASCR in a PLL. If it had a wordclock output and I could slave my soundcard to it, then it would be synchronous for all sample rates.
In any case, I think it is just sufficient to say "resampling to non-integer multiples" as opposed to "asynchronous versus synchronous".
Myself, I'm leaning towards NON-oversampling after what I've heard it do for PC audio, even using the famous Secret Rabbit Code upsampler. Oversampling is another ballpark and does (AKAIK) use even multiples of the sample rate.
Cheers,
Presto
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I thought this was "Mythbustered" already?? - Presto 15:45:19 04/16/07 (35)
- Re: I thought this was "Mythbustered" already?? - Todd Krieger 06:15:20 04/17/07 (7)
- Okay Todd, thanks for that very thorough response! nt - Presto 22:17:59 04/17/07 (0)
- This can easily be heard - Gofast 09:45:54 04/17/07 (5)
- Re: This can easily be heard - Todd Krieger 12:53:30 04/17/07 (4)
- An humble personal experience with the SRC2496. - beppe61 04:45:00 04/18/07 (2)
- Re: An humble personal experience with the SRC2496. - Todd Krieger 11:30:55 04/18/07 (1)
- Re: An humble personal experience with the SRC2496. - beppe61 02:09:46 04/19/07 (0)
- Some SRC2496 mods I want to try - Gofast 04:15:43 04/18/07 (0)
- I think the issue is that it's an extra set of filtering ... - Christine Tham 17:45:25 04/16/07 (26)
- Lynx and RME cards. - Presto 20:16:02 04/16/07 (25)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - laznos 20:35:39 04/17/07 (5)
- Correct - Christine Tham 20:45:12 04/17/07 (4)
- Re: Correct - RogerGraham 19:26:07 05/08/07 (0)
- Re: Correct - laznos 21:45:51 04/17/07 (2)
- Re: Correct - Christine Tham 22:28:15 04/17/07 (1)
- "Slave-Able" CD Transport..... - Todd Krieger 01:45:20 04/21/07 (0)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Christine Tham 21:11:03 04/16/07 (0)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Dawnrazor 20:58:41 04/16/07 (17)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Presto 22:40:32 04/16/07 (16)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Dawnrazor 23:12:11 04/16/07 (15)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Presto 13:35:34 04/17/07 (14)
- Thanks for the list - Christine Tham 17:17:47 04/17/07 (3)
- For multichannel / tri-amping? - Presto 18:29:41 04/17/07 (2)
- Re: For multichannel / tri-amping? - Vincent VRS 20:07:57 04/17/07 (0)
- Re: For multichannel / tri-amping? - Christine Tham 18:51:33 04/17/07 (0)
- Re: Lynx and RME cards. - Dawnrazor 13:59:22 04/17/07 (9)
- You're luckier than me. - Presto 16:17:44 04/17/07 (8)
- Re: You're luckier than me. - Dawnrazor 22:56:18 04/17/07 (7)
- I'm not smart... - Presto 10:14:20 04/18/07 (4)
- Remember - KISS is best - Christine Tham 14:52:29 04/18/07 (3)
- Re: Remember - KISS is best - endust4237 14:06:48 05/01/07 (0)
- just a bit more information on clocks to help you understand - Christine Tham 18:13:39 04/18/07 (1)
- Thanks Christine. You're a walking wiki. That's a keeper. :o) nt - Presto 13:46:55 04/19/07 (0)
- Re: You're luckier than me. - Christine Tham 23:25:59 04/17/07 (1)
- Oops - Dawnrazor 08:07:47 04/18/07 (0)