In Reply to: Which Universal Player would you upgrade? posted by John C. - Aussie on April 5, 2007 at 19:26:49:
So, among the better units, I guess it boils down to which have the best transport mechanisms and which have the best power supplies. But apart from the higher priced Esoteric models, it is hard to find out what transport mechanism are being used.There was an interesting discussion by Robert Harley in the latest TAS about the importance of that transport mechanism and he was very impressed by the one used in the super expensive Esoteric P-03.
It is VERY hard to decide when you are not in a position to borrow and compare. But if the unit is to be modded anyway, would such a home audition tell much anyway? Reading the raves of some of those who do mods would have you believe the end result of their efforts equals the best money can buy anywhere.
One such review is at
http://cls.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl?dgtlplay&1180296271)That particular company spurns the use of better clocking mechanisms at www.upgradecompany.com
There, they say:"The Upgrade Company does not recommend installing a "Superclock" nor any additional wiring nor circuit boards. Doing so simply collects more RF (radio frequency) and EMI (electro magnetically induced) noise and distortion, making the sound "different" but never better. The additional circuitry and wiring with aftermarket "clocks" negatively affects both digital signal and power supply lines because the additional circuitry and wiring perform like receiving antenna's, as all wiring and circuits do, picking up both internally generated and airborne RF and EMI, injecting a lot more noise directly into the data stream and power supply, compounding problems and hurting performance. Also the delay lines they create cause smearing and ringing. Very bad idea. In fact many installers are not aware that these supposed "Superclocks" radiate MORE RF directly into the other circuits and electronic components inside the unit like a sonic jackhammer, dramatically reducing measured and perceived performance. We have a better solution!"
Yet upgrading the clock is generally accepted as one of the first mods to perform!
Most confusing
John
Do not criticise the idiots in this world - we need them as they make the rest of us look so much better :-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Still researching, but it seems nearly all benefit from modding - but one company spurns clock upgrades! - John C. - Aussie 19:20:08 04/07/07 (27)
- Clocks - Dave Garretson 06:57:54 04/12/07 (1)
- That coincides with my (limited) experience also - John C. - Aussie 14:36:34 04/12/07 (0)
- Modding (aka "tweaking") - an analogy... - DevillEars 03:12:04 04/09/07 (0)
- Stock SCD-XA777ES vs modded ... - Dr.Jazz 17:48:15 04/08/07 (1)
- Haven't Sent My In For Mods - Robertc88 13:30:13 04/10/07 (0)
- Teac Esoteric Transport mechanism = VRDS-NEO - DevillEars 14:19:56 04/08/07 (6)
- And is the Esoteric UX-1MK2 a universal player worth investigating? - John C. - Aussie 19:28:07 04/08/07 (4)
- My apologies... 'twas not my intention... - DevillEars 01:14:23 04/09/07 (3)
- No need to apologise - John C. - Aussie 14:59:18 04/09/07 (2)
- I'd suggest a bit more research or just buy the Denon... - DevillEars 23:12:50 04/09/07 (1)
- Good advice thanks - John C. - Aussie 20:57:19 04/10/07 (0)
- Yes, VERY interesting thanks - John C. - Aussie 16:45:19 04/08/07 (0)
- Finally, someone who makes sense! - Christine Tham 03:08:35 04/08/07 (14)
- To mod or not to mod - John C. - Aussie 15:29:30 04/08/07 (4)
- Re: To mod or not to mod - Christine Tham 18:22:41 04/08/07 (3)
- Re: To mod or not to mod - John C. - Aussie 18:51:38 04/08/07 (2)
- Re: To mod or not to mod - Christine Tham 19:08:56 04/08/07 (1)
- I am also susceptible to the voodoo that surrounds this hobby of ours - John C. - Aussie 19:19:13 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Ted Smith 10:43:37 04/08/07 (5)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Christine Tham 17:52:02 04/08/07 (4)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Ted Smith 18:15:11 04/08/07 (3)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Christine Tham 18:41:09 04/08/07 (2)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Ted Smith 19:17:40 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Christine Tham 19:39:28 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:22:21 04/08/07 (2)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - Christine Tham 18:01:49 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: Finally, someone who makes sense! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:35:14 04/09/07 (0)