In Reply to: RE: A lot depends on where the screen tap is placed. posted by elblanco on October 11, 2024 at 18:19:14:
For example he states that PP amps will sound harsher on account of even ordered cancellation. This statement is false. He glossed over a bit in that no mention of the kind of non-linearity is mentioned (Quadratic vs Cubic in this case). In addition, he seems to not understand that the 3rd harmonic is treated much the same way as the 2nd by the ear. He compounds that error with false comments in various places in the video. He is correct though that you do want to minimize the 3rd an PP circuit.
In case there's any question about the 3rd being a problem to the ear, any properly functioning analog tape recorder produces a 3rd harmonic as its dominant harmonic distortion.
Ultralinear can be used in class A as well; he seems to gloss over this fact. The reason to use class A, triodes, ultralinear and other techniques is to minimize distortion because feedback isn't going to eliminate it- the more distortion the open loop circuit has, the more the closed loop circuit will have too. So there are class A ultralinear amps out there.
I'm not debunking this video- but I am saying its not 100% correct. For example you can build an ultralinear amplifier using only a pair of power tubes and a single 12AT7 or 12AU7. He is saying something else at 18:30 in the video...
At the same time there's a lot of really good information here.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- He's not completely correct on stuff he says in there, just so you know. - Ralph 09:47:24 10/14/24 (36)
- RE: He's not completely correct on stuff he says in there, just so you know. - Tre' 15:45:40 10/14/24 (34)
- Geez... - Ralph 08:23:07 10/15/24 (33)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 19:01:27 10/15/24 (32)
- RE: Geez... - PakProtector 08:30:19 10/17/24 (3)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 09:10:23 10/17/24 (2)
- RE: Geez... - PakProtector 03:58:27 10/18/24 (1)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 20:54:34 10/18/24 (0)
- I got that - Ralph 09:02:45 10/16/24 (27)
- RE: I got that - Tre' 17:55:26 10/16/24 (26)
- So the patent says 43% when a 6L6 is used? nt - Ralph 08:29:11 10/17/24 (25)
- RE: So the patent says 43% when a 6L6 is used? nt - Tre' 09:02:35 10/17/24 (24)
- RE: So... - Ralph 09:19:32 10/17/24 (23)
- RE: So... - Tre' 09:27:24 10/17/24 (22)
- RE: 'substantially', 'equivalents' - Ralph 09:44:56 10/17/24 (21)
- So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Tre' 10:22:32 10/17/24 (20)
- RE: So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Ralph 11:13:37 10/17/24 (19)
- This says that you are wrong. - Tre' 12:49:58 10/17/24 (12)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - Ralph 13:30:47 10/17/24 (11)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - Tre' 15:54:52 10/17/24 (10)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - elblanco 18:53:18 10/17/24 (8)
- Thank you. - Tre' 06:58:53 10/18/24 (7)
- RE: Thank you. - Ralph 11:45:50 10/18/24 (6)
- RE: Thank you. - Tre' 15:49:47 10/18/24 (5)
- RE: Thank you. - Ralph 15:07:28 10/19/24 (4)
- RE: Thank you. - tube wrangler 22:59:14 10/27/24 (1)
- If you read the UL patent I think it says why :) nt - Ralph 11:35:44 10/28/24 (0)
- RE: Thank you. - Tre' 18:15:29 10/19/24 (1)
- I understand your logic - Ralph 11:11:57 10/28/24 (0)
- they are 18.5% imp. 43% turns...-.-nt - elblanco 18:50:28 10/17/24 (0)
- RE: So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Tre' 11:53:46 10/17/24 (5)
- It should. nt - Ralph 13:27:55 10/17/24 (4)
- yep. nt - Tre' 16:46:59 10/17/24 (3)
- and bias, tapping , and load resistance all must work simpatico.. - elblanco 18:57:40 10/17/24 (2)
- and it originally comes from Blumlein...-. - elblanco 19:02:46 10/17/24 (1)
- RE: and it originally comes from Blumlein...-. - tube wrangler 19:20:39 10/31/24 (0)
- email him with your points of contention - elblanco 10:25:08 10/14/24 (0)