In Reply to: Are they ultralinear or triode? posted by Ralph on October 9, 2024 at 09:16:48:
Ultra linear.
| retro-thermionic |
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Are they ultralinear or triode? - mwhouston 22:30:39 10/09/24 (53)
- RE: Are they ultralinear or triode? - Tre' 17:54:05 10/10/24 (51)
- A lot depends on where the screen tap is placed. - Ralph 12:16:05 10/11/24 (50)
- RE: A lot depends on where the screen tap is placed. - elblanco 18:19:14 10/11/24 (45)
- He's not completely correct on stuff he says in there, just so you know. - Ralph 09:47:24 10/14/24 (36)
- RE: He's not completely correct on stuff he says in there, just so you know. - Tre' 15:45:40 10/14/24 (34)
- Geez... - Ralph 08:23:07 10/15/24 (33)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 19:01:27 10/15/24 (32)
- RE: Geez... - PakProtector 08:30:19 10/17/24 (3)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 09:10:23 10/17/24 (2)
- RE: Geez... - PakProtector 03:58:27 10/18/24 (1)
- RE: Geez... - Tre' 20:54:34 10/18/24 (0)
- I got that - Ralph 09:02:45 10/16/24 (27)
- RE: I got that - Tre' 17:55:26 10/16/24 (26)
- So the patent says 43% when a 6L6 is used? nt - Ralph 08:29:11 10/17/24 (25)
- RE: So the patent says 43% when a 6L6 is used? nt - Tre' 09:02:35 10/17/24 (24)
- RE: So... - Ralph 09:19:32 10/17/24 (23)
- RE: So... - Tre' 09:27:24 10/17/24 (22)
- RE: 'substantially', 'equivalents' - Ralph 09:44:56 10/17/24 (21)
- So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Tre' 10:22:32 10/17/24 (20)
- RE: So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Ralph 11:13:37 10/17/24 (19)
- This says that you are wrong. - Tre' 12:49:58 10/17/24 (12)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - Ralph 13:30:47 10/17/24 (11)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - Tre' 15:54:52 10/17/24 (10)
- RE: No, it is consistent with the patent. - elblanco 18:53:18 10/17/24 (8)
- Thank you. - Tre' 06:58:53 10/18/24 (7)
- RE: Thank you. - Ralph 11:45:50 10/18/24 (6)
- RE: Thank you. - Tre' 15:49:47 10/18/24 (5)
- RE: Thank you. - Ralph 15:07:28 10/19/24 (4)
- RE: Thank you. - tube wrangler 22:59:14 10/27/24 (1)
- If you read the UL patent I think it says why :) nt - Ralph 11:35:44 10/28/24 (0)
- RE: Thank you. - Tre' 18:15:29 10/19/24 (1)
- I understand your logic - Ralph 11:11:57 10/28/24 (0)
- they are 18.5% imp. 43% turns...-.-nt - elblanco 18:50:28 10/17/24 (0)
- RE: So what is the correct % for a 6l6? - Tre' 11:53:46 10/17/24 (5)
- It should. nt - Ralph 13:27:55 10/17/24 (4)
- yep. nt - Tre' 16:46:59 10/17/24 (3)
- and bias, tapping , and load resistance all must work simpatico.. - elblanco 18:57:40 10/17/24 (2)
- and it originally comes from Blumlein...-. - elblanco 19:02:46 10/17/24 (1)
- RE: and it originally comes from Blumlein...-. - tube wrangler 19:20:39 10/31/24 (0)
- email him with your points of contention - elblanco 10:25:08 10/14/24 (0)
- Thanks - Tre' 18:42:52 10/11/24 (7)
- RE: Thanks - elblanco 11:37:21 10/14/24 (0)
- RE: Thanks - PakProtector 06:26:37 10/14/24 (0)
- RE: Thanks - elblanco 13:47:26 10/12/24 (4)
- I believe that is just.... - Tre' 16:32:33 10/12/24 (3)
- RE: I believe that is just.... - elblanco 16:53:35 10/12/24 (2)
- Low and Hot? - FlaCharlie 07:47:03 10/14/24 (1)
- RE: Low and Hot? - elblanco 10:42:34 10/14/24 (0)
- We have been through this before - Tre' 17:19:45 10/11/24 (3)
- Absolutely right - Triode_Kingdom 09:31:47 10/13/24 (2)
- Whilst bashing the 6L6... - PakProtector 08:58:40 10/14/24 (1)
- RE: Whilst bashing the 6L6... - Triode_Kingdom 09:34:12 10/18/24 (0)
- That's the way to do it! nt - Ralph 08:33:46 10/10/24 (0)