In Reply to: Oops! I need a refresher course on tube physics. posted by kurt s on January 19, 2007 at 08:01:19:
It is a myth. Or, rather, an artifact of a model. Other models explain triode operation just as well, and more simply, without negative feedback.I have participated in strenuous, protracted, agonizing debates on this subject and have looked at all the arguments very carefully before coming to this conclusion.
It is a frustrating argument to have because the idea of triode NFB is one of those seductively simple ideas that most people can understand easily, and which also happens to be wrong. Or, more precisely, given a broader, deeper understanding of the subject, the triode NFB proposition loses significance and takes its place among a number of other abstractions.
Saying triodes have inherent NFB is kind of like saying, "Information is carried over long distances by electronics flowing through wires." Everyone knows it's true, but the deeper you look, the more incorrect the statement turns out to be.
-Henry
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The myth of triode NFB - Henry Pasternack 08:20:02 01/19/07 (11)
- Pentode positive feedback - Mark Kelly 15:15:38 01/19/07 (0)
- The myth of triode NFB - an article that perpetuates this myth - kurt s 09:26:15 01/19/07 (6)
- Re: The myth of triode NFB - an article that perpetuates this myth - Henry Pasternack 11:39:26 01/19/07 (5)
- Re: The myth of triode NFB - an article that perpetuates this myth - Naz 21:57:16 01/23/07 (1)
- Beautifully stated, Naz (nt) - BBeck 08:55:48 01/24/07 (0)
- Nice job! - Russ57 12:22:14 01/19/07 (0)
- You make a lot of sense, Henry. - kurt s 11:45:28 01/19/07 (1)
- Kurt and Henry: Nice Tutorial! - Thomas Martens 16:55:13 01/19/07 (0)
- Re: The myth of triode NFB - Pär 09:24:26 01/19/07 (0)
- Re: The myth of triode NFB - kurt s 08:41:30 01/19/07 (0)
- Now you make me started thinking.. - cheap-Jack 08:27:55 01/19/07 (0)