|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: You raise a very good point... posted by slope on March 25, 2004 at 15:55:59:
If I remember correctly, the redbook standard was adopted in the early 1980's. In light of what was going on in the early 1980's is the redbook standard really that awful?
This may shock you but I'm going to say it anyway. I don't think the redbook standard is as bad as it's sometimes made out to be. Over the past twenty years recording studios have learned many new techniques and new equipment has been developed to help recording studios; issues such as timing jitter can be reduced to below audibility.
I've got some really wonderful recordings in my collection of CD's. I suspect that you have quite a few yourself. If that's the case do you ever ask yourself, is it the format, or is it the recording studio?
In any case; try giving a read to this article:
http://www.audioholics.com/techtips/specsformats/CurrentFormatTrends.php
The Ever Evil Doctor Steel
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You raise a very good point... - Dan Banquer 06:42:54 03/26/04 (6)
- OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - slope 15:09:04 03/26/04 (5)
- Re: OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - Dan Banquer 17:55:49 03/26/04 (0)
- Re: OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - Phil Tower 16:18:09 03/26/04 (3)
- Re: OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - Dan Banquer 03:26:52 03/27/04 (2)
- Re: OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - Phil Tower 04:10:21 03/27/04 (1)
- Re: OK.. Redbook is a fine standard... - Dan Banquer 06:39:15 03/27/04 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
