In Reply to: Re: Too funny. Good one BJH. lol. This is a "containment site". :o) yer funny. nt posted by andy19191 on April 12, 2007 at 02:00:12:
A191 - Speaking as someone with a viewpoint far, far removed from that of bjh, I also view this as primarily a containment site and one that seems to work reasonably well in limiting the damage of a scientific view on many of the other boards.
Only a lunatic would expect a serious scientific debate on a site designed to be attractive to those that hold beliefs that are often in conflict with the scientific view. Any rational person would go off to a site that was aligned with their interests."Subjectivists" come here to sell their viewpoint to "objectivists" and "objectivists" largely do likewise but with the odd technical enquiry thrown in now and again.
I agree with you, but what about the "objectivist" who sees it as pure entertainment? Isn't that why you're here as well?cheers,
AJ
The threshold for disproving something is higher than the threshold for saying it, which is a recipe for the accumulation of bullshit - Softky
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Too funny. Good one BJH. lol. This is a "containment site". :o) yer funny. nt - AJinFLA 04:00:49 04/12/07 (3)
- Re: Too funny. Good one BJH. lol. This is a "containment site". :o) yer funny. nt - andy19191 06:10:44 04/12/07 (2)
- Re: Too funny. Good one BJH. lol. This is a "containment site". :o) yer funny. nt - AJinFLA 17:59:20 04/12/07 (0)
- A Possible Answer? - thetubeguy1954 08:26:53 04/12/07 (0)