In Reply to: Proposal to the Bored: Ban Posy Rorer posted by Jim Austin on April 11, 2007 at 14:28:51:
We might have given your proposal consideration absent a threat to cease participation. The latter makes that quite unlikely, for reasons which should be obvious to everyone.>>To all those who agree with me (and I know there are a lot of you) I encourage you NOT to reply to any of PR's posts.
This is the healthiest option for the community. It obviates a lot of grief and sends a clear message.
Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum, et cetera, et cetera...
Memo bis punitor delicatum! It's all there, black and white,
clear as crystal! Blah, blah, and so on and so forth ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Proposal to the Bored: Ban Posy Rorer - The Bored 15:00:19 04/11/07 (3)
- Re: Proposal to the Bored: Ban Posy Rorer - andy_c 21:15:11 04/11/07 (0)
- For what it's worth - Jim Austin 15:04:41 04/11/07 (1)
- "Her/his/its presence here." Can't let go eh? Talk about pit-bulls... nt - clarkjohnsen 15:15:57 04/11/07 (0)