In Reply to: What is your reaction to multi-channel recordings? posted by E-Stat on November 10, 2006 at 13:49:18:
I have a stack of decoders. SQ, QS, RM, dolby. (funny, I've got Empire's TOTL CD4 cartridge but no decoder for it or records.) I've also got a 4 channel tape deck. Right now I've got a 5 channel HT set up in my bedroom. Compared to my experimental system it is very disappointing. Remember I was around when 4 channel sound was anticipated to be viable. In fact, I read the very first issue of Stereo Review which suggested placing a rear speaker connected across the L+ and R+ speaker output terminals predecessor to Dynaco's Dynaquad system (I also have 2 SCA-80Q amps with built in dynaquad decoders.) Recently (around a year ago) I heard a Bose surround sound system. The salesman though it was fantastic. When he asked me what I thought I didn't have the heart to say it sucked so I said what I always say in those circumstances..."interesting"...just like I said when I heard the Martin Logan Summits.BTW, I don't expect you to believe it but the mathematical analysis predicts multi channel can't work because there is no way to keep the direct sound out of the microphones designed to record the ambient channels. There is simply no practical way to record just the ambient channels properly, they have to be resynthesized using an appropriate mathematical algorithm, something you'd appreciate. Also, there need to be at least 4 ambient channels in addition to the 4 main channels because the sound field they have to recreate is a vector field, another critical factor which seems to have escaped those who conceived these systems.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: What is your reaction to multi-channel recordings? - Soundmind 15:13:53 11/10/06 (21)
- Strictly speaking, I wasn't asking about "decoders" - E-Stat 18:58:28 11/10/06 (20)
- Re: Strictly speaking, I wasn't asking about "decoders" - Soundmind 04:39:40 11/11/06 (19)
- Different strokes - E-Stat 08:37:12 11/11/06 (18)
- Re: Different strokes - unclestu52 14:11:11 11/11/06 (13)
- James Bongiorno Trinaural Processor? - thetubeguy1954 07:49:37 11/13/06 (2)
- Trinaural - unclestu52 11:03:33 11/13/06 (1)
- Re: Trinaural - David Yost 04:56:15 11/16/06 (0)
- I would like to hear Ray's setup - E-Stat 18:46:26 11/11/06 (9)
- Re: I would like to hear Ray's setup - unclestu52 11:09:43 11/13/06 (0)
- E-stat, If you were a REAL engineer.... - Soundmind 05:59:23 11/13/06 (7)
- And if you were half as smart as you think you are... - morricab 04:18:28 11/14/06 (5)
- Re: And if you were half as smart as you think you are... - Soundmind 06:56:45 11/14/06 (4)
- It would be interesting if you marketed your invention - kerr 09:28:58 11/14/06 (2)
- That was twenty years ago - E-Stat 14:06:58 11/14/06 (1)
- Re: That was twenty years ago - kerr 05:07:19 11/15/06 (0)
- Re: And if you were half as smart as you think you are... - morricab 09:06:15 11/14/06 (0)
- Despite the fact you are impressed with yourself - E-Stat 07:16:02 11/13/06 (0)
- Re: Different strokes - Soundmind 10:57:20 11/11/06 (3)
- As usual, completely different takes on life - E-Stat 11:34:49 11/11/06 (2)
- Re: As usual, completely different takes on life - Soundmind 13:32:18 11/11/06 (1)
- Thus Spake SMarathustra - E-Stat 18:34:14 11/11/06 (0)