In Reply to: Re: Ok posted by Pat D on November 1, 2006 at 14:14:38:
I agree with your main argument but I would like to take issue on one point.> or do you take the word of those who work in the relevant fields
A scientists word is no more trustworthy than an audiophiles.
What makes scientific literature relatively trustworthy, unlike audiophile literature, is the continuous checking by peers and the consequences for the author of getting things wrong whether by ignorance or intent.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Ok - andy19191 14:34:40 11/01/06 (5)
- What did scientists think - E-Stat 16:12:35 11/01/06 (4)
- Re: What did scientists think - andy19191 01:04:53 11/02/06 (3)