|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Not familiar with the concept of a "rhetorical question" ? posted by E-Stat on January 2, 2006 at 07:54:58:
I'm just continuing to point out that not only are you clueless in Atlanta, and the only thing you have to contribute is meaningless bullshit. Every response from you so far as confirmed exactly that. You don't even have the where with all to ask an intelligent question.
It's going to be a great new yer.
d.b.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Boston Globe: "Science closes in on mystery." YES! - clarkjohnsen 09:00:28 12/31/05 (99)
- The gap between science and cynics remain a mystery. - soulfood 09:03:03 01/01/06 (4)
- Certainly *part* of the point. The rest is that... - clarkjohnsen 11:40:31 01/04/06 (3)
- Ironclad stuff. I thought you might be addressing listening vs preconceptions. - soulfood 14:44:46 01/04/06 (2)
- "...others seemingly gullible while laying in wait..." I'm personally unacquainted with any of that species... - clarkjohnsen 15:47:54 01/04/06 (1)
- Yes, the masks worn are interchangeable. - soulfood 20:53:49 01/04/06 (0)
- Some inmates don’t understand the difference between “observation†and “proof†- Caymus 15:32:39 12/31/05 (22)
- Would that you knew what you were talking about - Norm 18:13:41 12/31/05 (21)
- "I don't need or care to prove I am right to you or any other fool." REPEAT -- - clarkjohnsen 16:36:16 01/03/06 (0)
- Confusing “hypothesis†and “observation†with “proof� - Caymus 19:47:35 12/31/05 (19)
- The data test your hypothesis. - Norm 20:23:38 12/31/05 (18)
- Are y'all still on about "invalid DBT"? - Silver Eared John 22:14:13 12/31/05 (17)
- No, we are talking about invalid measurements of concepts. Sorry to confuse you. nt - Norm 07:20:38 01/01/06 (16)
- Ducking, are we? - Silver Eared John 21:03:22 01/01/06 (15)
- Just knowledge. nt - Norm 07:07:47 01/02/06 (14)
- Still unclear, I see... - Silver Eared John 10:23:54 01/03/06 (13)
- Still unclear evidentally - Norm 17:41:17 01/03/06 (12)
- And still unclear... - Silver Eared John 17:51:34 01/03/06 (11)
- Re: And still unclear... - townie 00:41:59 01/04/06 (10)
- At least you’ve confirmed your preference is influenced by non-audible features - Caymus 14:59:18 01/04/06 (7)
- Re: At least you’ve confirmed your preference is influenced by non-audible features - townie 09:06:43 01/05/06 (2)
- Re: At least you’ve confirmed your preference is influenced by non-audible features - Caymus 12:43:59 01/05/06 (1)
- Re: At least you’ve confirmed your preference is influenced by non-audible features - townie 22:20:05 01/05/06 (0)
- "If the test was done correctly" This is a pretty big if. - Norm 17:36:57 01/04/06 (3)
- How can you verify… - Caymus 17:53:24 01/04/06 (2)
- Ultimately, we cannot - Norm 06:53:47 01/05/06 (1)
- If y'all the consumer, does it matter if y'all happy? - Silver Eared John 01:17:55 01/06/06 (0)
- Well, y'all, we agree on that... - Silver Eared John 10:40:26 01/04/06 (1)
- And this relates to what? - Bob Wortman 13:43:56 12/31/05 (70)
- Re: And this relates to what? - markrohr 14:40:34 12/31/05 (69)
- big difference - tunenut 14:11:10 01/01/06 (0)
- Sorry, y'all, the analogy fails... - Silver Eared John 14:51:34 12/31/05 (67)
- AND we see you weaseled out of a reply to the Crown preamp remark. nt - clarkjohnsen 16:32:27 01/03/06 (0)
- Actually, it works just fine. - markrohr 09:05:24 01/01/06 (51)
- Nope, y'all aren't around the idea - Silver Eared John 21:04:29 01/01/06 (50)
- Re: Nope, y'all aren't around the idea - Tre' 20:08:24 01/04/06 (1)
- Unfortunately, he is - E-Stat 13:41:29 01/07/06 (0)
- "With an amplifier... we can measure everything that it sends to the speaker." Intellectual arrogance pure and simple. n - clarkjohnsen 16:27:52 01/03/06 (47)
- Y'all just can't stop it, can y'all - Silver Eared John 18:58:30 01/03/06 (46)
- I am not sure that this is really true SEJ... - morricab 08:31:03 01/10/06 (0)
- Re: Y'all just can't stop it, can y'all - Tre' 20:10:19 01/04/06 (1)
- Those two alternatives? I'll pick #2. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:48:44 01/05/06 (0)
- Was it not true . . . - markrohr 08:33:43 01/04/06 (42)
- Gonna follow-up his non-response? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:50:00 01/05/06 (0)
- Y'all need to do some homework... - Silver Eared John 13:05:37 01/04/06 (12)
- "So, y'all, what next?"---I posted it before. Do your homework. Meanwhile, do you ever address an actual point? nt - markrohr 09:58:13 01/05/06 (3)
- Re: "So, y'all, what next?"---I posted it before. Do your homework. Meanwhile, do you ever address an actual point? nt - Dan Banquer 17:06:07 01/06/06 (2)
- Um . . . - markrohr 18:57:00 01/06/06 (1)
- Re: Um . . . - Dan Banquer 04:50:38 01/07/06 (0)
- Hey Mark! He's saying you got the dates wrong, not the argument. Congratulations. nt - clarkjohnsen 15:50:09 01/04/06 (7)
- Yep, as usual, audio was way behind the times... - Silver Eared John 18:39:03 01/05/06 (6)
- Still weaseling out of the question. Beautiful show! Shows that way deep down you're... - clarkjohnsen 09:16:10 01/06/06 (1)
- Re: Still weaseling out of the question. Beautiful show! Shows that way deep down you're... - Dan Banquer 17:10:02 01/06/06 (0)
- Would be nice if you actually answered the question: there's nothing left to learn about amplifiers? We're *done*?nt - markrohr 03:21:33 01/06/06 (3)
- Didn't say that, so why don't y'all go bother someone who did... - Silver Eared John 16:41:29 01/06/06 (2)
- Ei-yi-yi. - markrohr 19:13:21 01/06/06 (1)
- I'm not to blame for y'all inability to read. - Silver Eared John 14:51:50 01/07/06 (0)
- "How do we know when we're done?" EASY! Just ask SEJJ or jj. - clarkjohnsen 11:36:57 01/04/06 (27)
- Y'all have to keep up the stalkin' don't ye? - Silver Eared John 13:06:50 01/04/06 (26)
- "...then physics is broken." O ye of small minds! Most of the measurements made by the regnant orthodoxy... - clarkjohnsen 15:45:49 01/04/06 (25)
- Y'all awake there, fella? - Silver Eared John 23:07:35 01/04/06 (24)
- You are *so* full of it. - clarkjohnsen 09:47:15 01/05/06 (23)
- Two orthogonal scalars make a vector. - Silver Eared John 18:00:23 01/05/06 (22)
- "Frequency response" (a favorite measurement) is a scalar. THD (another) is similarly neglectful... - clarkjohnsen 09:13:52 01/06/06 (21)
- So who is suggesting we'd use that, Clark? - Silver Eared John 12:13:36 01/06/06 (20)
- Re: So who is suggesting we'd use that, Clark? - markrohr 13:07:06 01/06/06 (19)
- He's still weaseling out of the question. Beautiful! This one goes into Permanent File. nt - clarkjohnsen 09:22:16 01/07/06 (17)
- When y'all learn the difference between a scalar, a vector, and a function of 't', get back to me. - Silver Eared John 14:55:06 01/07/06 (16)
- Everyone look: WEASELING WEASELING WEASELING! nt - clarkjohnsen 08:43:14 01/08/06 (15)
- Y'all certainly are, Clark - Silver Eared John 13:49:18 01/09/06 (14)
- STILL WON'T ADDRESS QUESTION. SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF SELF. BUT ISN'T. STOP. nt - clarkjohnsen 23:32:40 01/09/06 (13)
- Well, as a sensible question, slick - Silver Eared John 23:38:33 01/09/06 (12)
- Now we may add boldfaced lying, to your miserable weaseling and your rudeness. The question plainly stated: - clarkjohnsen 00:12:57 01/10/06 (11)
- There's no question in that post, slick... - Silver Eared John 16:28:30 01/10/06 (10)
- Re: "There's no question in that post, slick." None anyway that you can answer. IN FACT THERE WERE FOUR. - clarkjohnsen 17:17:25 01/10/06 (9)
- Yeah, yeah... - Silver Eared John 19:58:03 01/10/06 (8)
- Re: No… - $orabji! 15:58:49 01/12/06 (7)
- Please, no substance! No direct answers! ;-) - markrohr 11:53:43 01/13/06 (6)
- Shame y'all couldn't google for 10 seconds... - Silver Eared John 13:15:08 01/13/06 (5)
- When you're interested in conversing rather than preening get back to me. nt - markrohr 15:10:29 01/13/06 (4)
- When y'all interested in real discussion, y'all get back to me. - Silver Eared John 17:42:10 01/13/06 (3)
- Re: When y'all interested in real discussion, y'all get back to me. - markrohr 07:49:16 01/14/06 (2)
- Also... - Silver Eared John 20:52:58 01/14/06 (0)
- Let me explain... - Silver Eared John 20:50:35 01/14/06 (0)
- Don't try to fool me,, son, that's not suggesting the use of a "scalar"... - Silver Eared John 13:29:49 01/06/06 (0)
- And still not really understand what causes qualitative differences - E-Stat 08:12:51 01/01/06 (13)
- Well, actually, y'all ought to go to the literature - Silver Eared John 21:05:27 01/01/06 (2)
- Ah yes, the literature! - E-Stat 06:27:32 01/02/06 (1)
- Re: Ah yes, the literature! - Dan Banquer 07:23:41 01/02/06 (0)
- Clueless in Atlanta - Dan Banquer 15:14:11 01/01/06 (6)
- Tell me, Dan - E-Stat 06:24:38 01/02/06 (5)
- Clueless in Atlanta - Dan Banquer 07:15:02 01/02/06 (4)
- Not familiar with the concept of a "rhetorical question" ? - E-Stat 07:54:58 01/02/06 (3)
- Nothing Knee Jerk about it. - Dan Banquer 08:07:48 01/02/06 (2)
- So, what's a "yer" ? (nt) - E-Stat 08:17:04 01/02/06 (1)
- Well, about 3/4 of a mongolian house? - Silver Eared John 21:06:00 01/02/06 (0)
- You are a cruel man - kerr 13:40:47 01/01/06 (1)
- Yep - E-Stat 06:57:36 01/02/06 (0)
- Yup, had one in the early 70s. Though I'd *kill* to have a panorama control again! nt - markrohr 09:52:22 01/01/06 (0)
Follow Ups
- Nothing Knee Jerk about it. - Dan Banquer 08:07:48 01/02/06 (2)
- So, what's a "yer" ? (nt) - E-Stat 08:17:04 01/02/06 (1)
- Well, about 3/4 of a mongolian house? - Silver Eared John 21:06:00 01/02/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
