Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.
In Reply to: Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? posted by gymwear5@hotmail.com on July 6, 2005 at 06:31:07:
a
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full Thread Please enable JavaScript to allow Full Thread view. Topic - Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - Norm 16:14:09 06/25/05 (40) I wish we could reverse-engineer Carnegie... - Bill Way 16:45:03 07/31/05 (0) What y'all on about, Norm? - Silver Eared John 12:55:07 07/07/05 (0) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - gymwear5@hotmail.com 06:31:07 07/06/05 (4) Why not 100%? That is my point. Our understanding is limited. nt - Norm 17:21:50 07/06/05 (3) Re: No - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 06:42:24 07/08/05 (2) Re: No - Jacques 02:30:30 07/09/05 (1) Re: No - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 14:25:27 07/09/05 (0) Chaos at work, there. And by that I mean the behaviour of complex systems... - orejones 04:36:42 06/30/05 (0) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - RBP 18:44:31 06/29/05 (2) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - clifff 03:29:59 06/30/05 (1) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - RBP 21:55:31 07/02/05 (0) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - Soundmind 09:20:49 06/29/05 (1) What y'all talkin' about? - Silver Eared John 13:01:41 07/07/05 (0) Objective acoustics - jbmcb 08:06:49 06/27/05 (21) No answer or ... - cheap-Jack 08:54:11 07/06/05 (0) Re: Objective acoustics - gymwear5@hotmail.com 10:34:48 06/30/05 (0) A 'silly' question.... - cheap-Jack 12:55:10 06/29/05 (0) Re: Objective acoustics - Soundmind 08:07:51 06/28/05 (5) Don'tch just hate that? - Silver Eared John 12:59:14 07/07/05 (0) Warning: RealPlayer - markrohr 09:02:40 06/28/05 (3) Re: Warning: RealPlayer - Soundmind 09:47:13 06/28/05 (1) Your experience differs from that of many others. - markrohr 10:02:11 06/28/05 (0) Fixing realplayer - jbmcb 09:26:07 06/28/05 (0) I am confused by your comment - Norm 17:05:12 06/27/05 (11) Re: I am confused by your comment - Jacques 01:49:04 06/29/05 (0) Confusion of categories. - Al Sekela 20:30:11 06/28/05 (0) Re: "the best guide" - jensw 23:49:52 06/27/05 (0) Clear as mud :) - jbmcb 19:59:24 06/27/05 (6) Your analogy is 'out to lunch'. - cheap-Jack 11:09:57 06/28/05 (5) In like Flynn! - jbmcb 20:10:17 06/28/05 (4) Pls don't put the cart before the horse. - cheap-Jack 11:14:01 06/29/05 (0) Re: In like Flynn! - Soundmind 05:34:29 06/29/05 (2) Re: In like Flynn! - jbmcb 08:15:44 06/29/05 (0) You can rant with the best of them (audiophiles). ;^) (nt) - soulfood 07:56:09 06/29/05 (0) The promise to clone a hall's acoustics may very well be a scam.(nt) - soulfood 17:54:49 06/27/05 (0) Here's some neat stuff from UC Berkeley - andy_c 08:22:51 06/26/05 (0) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - john curl 18:09:11 06/25/05 (0) Re: Okay, objectivists what is with hall acoustic? - Pat D 17:55:31 06/25/05 (0) Silly Norm. - Steve Eddy 17:43:06 06/25/05 (1) No, I don't. Pls tell me why? (nt) - cheap-Jack 07:42:03 06/27/05 (0) Follow Ups Why not 100%? That is my point. Our understanding is limited. nt - Norm 17:21:50 07/06/05 (3) Re: No - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 06:42:24 07/08/05 (2) Re: No - Jacques 02:30:30 07/09/05 (1) Re: No - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 14:25:27 07/09/05 (0)