In Reply to: Sorry, I missed that point... posted by Wellfed on June 17, 2005 at 21:17:51:
not much to add to my post or to the article per se, except either it works for you or it doesn't - just like any tweak or whatever. Either it makes a difference (that has value) or there is no difference. Not much more to it than that. Except for some, why it works and I really do not care to speculate on that issue as I am not so sure that 1) it really matters, and 2) they can offer an explanantion that is satisfactory to one and all.
With regards to 1 above, it it works (makes a difference that is of value) who cares why? The two who were off-axis listening casually, heard a difference 100% of the time, whereas the two listening critically were not so confident in the casual blind test I threw together. Yes, it was not rigorous and hardly statistically valid, but the results are interesting none the less. Am not so sure that if the chip's affects are a result of a placebo effct, I would have got the same results.
My reaction to the chip? Heard it, I think it makes a difference - slight though positive - but am not so sure that is is all that dramatic. That is, to me and a few others locally who have tried it, it makes about the same improvement to CDs as other tweaks (painting the edges, cleaners, etc.). All do something, but none by themself make one go HOLY SHIT, WOW! More like, "It sounds a little more like this and a little less like that" sort of thing.
Carol, who had better hearing than me and enjoys trying the Belt stuff, heard no difference at all.
Perhaps an issue of how we all want/value/precieve (hear) things differently?
Dave Clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- well... - drclark 08:34:23 06/18/05 (31)
- Re: well... - Par Time Punk 03:00:00 06/19/05 (24)
- Re: well... - KlausR. 03:18:16 06/19/05 (23)
- Re: well... - Par Time Punk 01:01:40 06/20/05 (22)
- Re: Believe the hype... - geoffkait 02:48:57 06/20/05 (21)
- Has it got the "EC approved" stamp? (nt) - orejones 03:47:14 06/20/05 (20)
- Re: The editor and senior reviewer of Hi Fi News liked it... - geoffkait 04:33:05 06/20/05 (19)
- Do you know what that approval means? It seems you don´t... (nt) - orejones 04:36:03 06/21/05 (14)
- Re: Approval - geoffkait 04:52:39 06/21/05 (13)
- QEE (Quod Erat Expectandum) (nt) - orejones 10:27:23 06/21/05 (12)
- Re: AAAI (Ad Absurdum Ad Infinitum) nt - geoffkait 14:10:15 06/21/05 (11)
- "AAAI (Ad Absurdum Ad Infinitum)" ... a nice definition of the whole GSIC affair, isn´t it? (nt) - orejones 02:31:46 06/22/05 (10)
- Re: There's an old French expression, "It takes two to tango." nt - geoffkait 02:57:34 06/22/05 (9)
- No Geoff, in France they say:.... - KlausR. 01:06:20 06/24/05 (4)
- Re: Klaus, over here we have an expression... - geoffkait 03:26:51 06/24/05 (3)
- I see you've fed your bablefish - KlausR. 05:17:46 06/24/05 (2)
- Re: Just the facts, Ma'am - geoffkait 06:34:32 06/24/05 (1)
- Facts, where are facts? - KlausR. 07:28:11 06/24/05 (0)
- NOT French !! - clifff 14:13:54 06/23/05 (3)
- Re: You're right! - geoffkait 14:49:38 06/23/05 (2)
- Don't give up your day job. - clifff 15:14:47 06/23/05 (1)
- Re: Cliffff - You're too fast for me :-) nt - geoffkait 04:41:49 06/24/05 (0)
- And the audio press also likes... - KlausR. 09:36:28 06/20/05 (3)
- Re: Really? Two reviewers agree on something? n - geoffkait 12:05:22 06/20/05 (2)
- You did not get my point, did you??? - KlausR. 09:25:53 06/21/05 (1)
- Re: You had a point? - geoffkait 10:24:34 06/21/05 (0)
- Thanks Dave... - Wellfed 21:13:04 06/18/05 (0)
- Why do you think it is safe to use? - Al Sekela 09:41:00 06/18/05 (4)
- interesting observation - unclestu52 11:32:37 06/18/05 (0)
- good points... - drclark 10:06:16 06/18/05 (2)
- Re: good points... - Tom Dawson 00:43:28 06/20/05 (0)
- I see your point: - Al Sekela 09:03:17 06/19/05 (0)