Home Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Nice post

You make very good arguments here and raise some important points.

The thing that struck me about your response, and also what Kal often says, - is that there are an ever increasing amount of recordings that use multi-channel effectively for much better sound/realism than can be achieved with stereo.

I must admit:

1. I'm not really a classical musical fan. And, although I was arguing as a "devil's advocate," and presenting my arguments from the perspective of an "unexperienced" music playback gear consumer: multichannel (good recordings) are mostly confined to classical. Speaking for myself, the only reason why I have 2 channel SACD is because of APL's incredible value, and SACD as an afterthought that I'd happily live without to be able to play DVDs and listen to the incredible redbook: as there are well under 50 SACDs that I would want to own, and less than half of those are perceptably better than redbook, - IMO. (Yes, - rock and some jazz recordings mostly suck, - IMO, - there's a lot of room to improve upon redbook both in recording and playback).

2. As classical music continues to die, fade, and no longer becomes economically viable for software manufacturers, adding a new hardware, playback system to improve it is a fools errand: especially given the expense, and the "layman's" or "rookie's" ability to get confused with hiRez formats in general; how it relates to home theatre, and/or the ability to build a good sounding system.

The first thing that my cosongwriter/guitarist friend asked me at CES was, "what the hell is SACD?"

Cheers R...



"Swimming in the river that floods the neighborhood, I could call to you, but it would do no good"


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Kimber Kable  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • Nice post - Sordidman 09:32:21 11/29/05 (0)


You can not post to an archived thread.