|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: "There's not enough convincing evidence." Hmm... What's the scientific criterion for "convincing"? Where... posted by clarkjohnsen on May 6, 2007 at 13:33:52:
As I'm browsing what I have about this polarity issue, I come across this :
"When you reverse connections at a loudspeaker, yes you reverse audio signal polarity. But you also reverse the direction the audio signal is applied to wire in the loudspeaker and to capacitors, inductors and resistors in the crossover. When you reverse wires, capacitors, resistors and inductors in the audio signal path, the result is an audible change in the sound."If this is correct, and I can't see any reason why it isn't, all experiments done hitherto are flawed from the outset. If you further consider the (asymmetric) distortion issue (LP playback, speakers)you have another basic flaw.
Now YOU explain.
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: However, all the evidence you may need is in the very book described in your referenced article - KlausR. 07:08:36 05/07/07 (34)
- Mr. Blackburn is sorely mistaken on this topic, and I have published a rebuttal. BUT: - clarkjohnsen 07:55:44 05/07/07 (33)
- Re: You avoided answering my question - KlausR. 09:03:26 05/07/07 (32)
- Contrary to the contempt and condescension shown by tlyyra below... - clarkjohnsen 13:57:09 05/07/07 (31)
- And this you call a rebuttal? - KlausR. 00:04:55 05/08/07 (1)
- "Your 'evidence' is not convincing." Back, as always, to that. I.e.... - clarkjohnsen 09:11:50 05/08/07 (1)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
