In Reply to: Acoustic polarity, again posted by KlausR. on May 6, 2007 at 02:36:41:
The effects of polarity switching, even with polarity-coherent speakers can be very subtle. The recordings themselves are not consistent, although many labels are MOSTLY consistent. Some discs have, e.g., the vocalist recorded in one polarity and the backup instruments in another, and this was intentional. Most important, If you don't have polarity switching available at your preamp, all you can do is switch speaker cables, a pain in the neck (I know whereof I speak).On the other hand, once you've heard and can detect "right" and "wrong" polaity, it becomes something of a curse -- you can't NOT hear it. I'm not at all sure that I wouldn't prefer speakers that mask the difference, unlike my Gallo Ref 3s.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Lotsa reasons - Dave Pogue 04:53:43 05/06/07 (39)
- Re: Lotsa reasons - KlausR. 07:33:20 05/06/07 (38)
- "There's not enough convincing evidence." Hmm... What's the scientific criterion for "convincing"? Where... - clarkjohnsen 13:33:52 05/06/07 (35)
- Re: However, all the evidence you may need is in the very book described in your referenced article - KlausR. 07:08:36 05/07/07 (34)
- Mr. Blackburn is sorely mistaken on this topic, and I have published a rebuttal. BUT: - clarkjohnsen 07:55:44 05/07/07 (33)
- Re: You avoided answering my question - KlausR. 09:03:26 05/07/07 (32)
- Contrary to the contempt and condescension shown by tlyyra below... - clarkjohnsen 13:57:09 05/07/07 (31)
- And this you call a rebuttal? - KlausR. 00:04:55 05/08/07 (1)
- "Your 'evidence' is not convincing." Back, as always, to that. I.e.... - clarkjohnsen 09:11:50 05/08/07 (1)
- From the way you present your POV - Dave Pogue 07:44:23 05/06/07 (1)
- "Not enough convincing evidence . . ." - markrohr 08:27:03 05/06/07 (0)