In Reply to: Probably not at all as good an idea as you think. posted by Henry Pasternack on January 8, 2007 at 19:09:52:
Hi Henry,Please explain why is a guarantee needed, and wouldn't the redundancy be far more reliable and desireable overall than counting on just one set of contacts??
Off the top of my head, my solution here seems to outweigh any nitpickings I can think of, but maybe you can explain your concerns more clearly, because I initially feel my solution is more valid and desireable than your nitpickings Henry. Explain to us all, I'd be interested to hear your case.
Or, were you just trying to have some fun - and razzz Jeff . Explain yourself, I did myself.
Jeff Medwin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why?? - drlowmu 20:10:34 01/08/07 (46)
- Re: Why?? - Steve O 21:11:26 01/08/07 (42)
- Re: Why?? - drlowmu 22:56:03 01/08/07 (41)
- Re: Why?? - Henry Pasternack 08:25:15 01/09/07 (40)
- Why ..... its your turn Henry... - drlowmu 13:34:26 01/09/07 (39)
- Re: Why ..... its your turn Henry... - Henry Pasternack 15:41:01 01/09/07 (1)
- Re: Why ..... its your turn Henry... - mikeyb 14:56:57 01/09/07 (0)
- Re: Why ..... its your turn Henry... - Tre' 14:02:33 01/09/07 (36)
- Yo Tre', - drlowmu 22:32:21 01/09/07 (35)
- Re: Yo Tre', - Tre' 09:17:10 01/10/07 (1)
- - OK - - drlowmu 13:56:48 01/13/07 (0)
- What's wrong with RDH4? - Ray Moth 05:37:54 01/10/07 (32)
- Re: What's wrong with RDH4? - Tre' 10:02:00 01/10/07 (4)
- Not totally correct Tre' !! - drlowmu 21:08:18 01/10/07 (0)
- RDH(4) is my reference bible... - cheap-Jack 11:40:39 01/10/07 (2)
- Re: RDH(4) is my reference bible... - Tre' 17:22:21 01/10/07 (1)
- No wonder he gets more foes than friends here. - cheap-Jack 08:20:52 01/11/07 (0)
- Re: What's wrong with RDH4? - mikeyb 07:04:31 01/10/07 (26)
- IEEE - Triode_Kingdom 13:06:59 01/10/07 (25)
- Re: IEEE - rdf 12:05:52 01/11/07 (0)
- First Principle... - Steve O 21:02:31 01/10/07 (0)
- Jeff critiques RDH (4) - drlowmu 19:54:36 01/10/07 (8)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - Ray Moth 13:17:14 01/12/07 (0)
- Don't "draw a red herring across the trail", please. - cheap-Jack 09:05:56 01/11/07 (0)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - Henry Pasternack 20:23:10 01/10/07 (5)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - drlowmu 20:50:12 01/10/07 (2)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - Triode_Kingdom 13:15:58 01/11/07 (1)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - drlowmu 15:05:11 01/11/07 (0)
- Re: Jeff critiques RDH (4) - Tre' 20:36:38 01/10/07 (1)
- Not really true... - drlowmu 20:59:46 01/10/07 (0)
- Re: IEEE - mikeyb 13:41:58 01/10/07 (0)
- Red Herring - Henry Pasternack 13:30:37 01/10/07 (12)
- Re: Red Herring - Triode_Kingdom 13:08:52 01/11/07 (11)
- evidence isn't the issue - Russ57 05:34:47 01/12/07 (2)
- Re: evidence isn't the issue - Triode_Kingdom 10:44:28 01/12/07 (1)
- Pardon me for being dense, but... - Henry Pasternack 12:28:59 01/12/07 (0)
- Re: Red Herring - Henry Pasternack 14:54:12 01/11/07 (7)
- Re: Red Herring - Triode_Kingdom 10:59:04 01/12/07 (6)
- Re: Red Herring - Henry Pasternack 11:57:23 01/12/07 (5)
- Wow, what a thread! - Ray Moth 13:22:18 01/12/07 (4)
- It may be a simple on/off switch... - Steve O 16:00:21 01/12/07 (1)
- Yes, I know what you mean - Ray Moth 17:04:33 01/12/07 (0)
- Re: Wow, what a thread! - drlowmu 13:56:20 01/12/07 (1)
- Go for it! [nt] - Ray Moth 17:02:14 01/12/07 (0)
- Re: Why?? - nerdorama 20:54:14 01/08/07 (2)
- Perhaps a Misunderstanding... - Triode_Kingdom 22:54:40 01/08/07 (0)
- Re: Why?? - drlowmu 22:52:02 01/08/07 (0)