Then why do so many people out there prefer the sound of tube rectifiers to solid state alternatives which offer dramatically lower resistance ? Morevoer, why do many people prefer the sound of directly heated rectifier tubes over their lower resistance cousins?I think I would be correct in making the assertion that the difference in series resistance between a 5U4 and UF4007s would swamp the difference between a 30 ohm transformer and a 6 ohm 'ultra-fi' alternative. Similarly, wouldn't the difference in resistance between a 5R4 and 5AR4 be about the same as that beween an 'ultra-fi' transformer and an 'also ran'?
In a 12B4 linestage test mule (ccs-shunt reg-ccs configuration) that I have been messing around with for the best part of a year I have (among other things)observed the following:
1. the sound improved noticeably when I went from capacitor filter to an LC filter (actually there is still a 1uF cap before the choke just to bump the voltage up to minimum required)using a 10H 200R (!!!) choke.
2. After extensive rectifier rolling, I definitely prefer the sound of a good directly heated rectifier to an indirect, finding them to generally offer a more immediate sound in this application with better dynamics and palpability - despite their greater resistance.
3. Differences in psu configuration and rectifier are surprisingly easy to hear, despite the supposed 100db+ isolation offered by the ccs-reg-ccs configuration (if anyone has a suggestion why, I would be interested to hear).
4. Plain aluminium Hammond chassis have an industrial look that can grow on you if you are somewhat manually challenged.PSU output voltage is not an issue here because as long as the psu outputs the minimum required for the shunt reg all is fine, and any excess voltage produced by more efficient rectifiers is taken up by the first ccs - as far as the last ccs and tube are concerned there is no difference in voltage attributable to different rectifiers.
As an aside, I also seem to remember reading an interesting article by Dan McLaughlin a while back on his 71A 'Quark' in which he made the asserion that the sound improved commensurately with the number of LC sections (8uF oil caps)in the psu. He actually reported a positive correlation between increased resistance and good sound.
In conclusion, while I am sure that in some applications low DCR power supplies will sound better than low resistance alternatives, I not see the achievement of ultra low DCR as a panacea, and question its potential cost-effectiveness.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - mach1 20:07:24 07/04/06 (43)
- Dan's 71A SE was a CCS loaded parafeed.. - C.Y 07:47:30 07/05/06 (17)
- Re: Dan's 71A SE was a CCS loaded parafeed.. - drlowmu 21:38:00 07/05/06 (15)
- I did not paralleled the recitifier yet.. - C.Y 01:02:25 07/06/06 (14)
- Re: I did not paralleled the recitifier yet.. - drlowmu 06:33:57 07/06/06 (13)
- I want to try Low DCR for my linestage .. - C.Y 07:19:38 07/06/06 (12)
- Re: I want to try Low DCR for my linestage .. - drlowmu 09:12:06 07/06/06 (11)
- Re: I want to try Low DCR for my linestage .. - C.Y 15:32:20 07/06/06 (10)
- Problem with Toroid Power Transformers - drlowmu 17:05:39 07/06/06 (9)
- Re: Problem with Toroid Power Transformers - C.Y 17:08:20 07/06/06 (8)
- This Trannie SHOULD work well enough......C.Y - drlowmu 10:00:12 07/07/06 (4)
- Re: This Trannie SHOULD work well enough......C.Y - C.Y 23:18:58 07/07/06 (3)
- When subbing in Low HY L1s................... - drlowmu 20:44:54 07/09/06 (2)
- Re: When subbing in Low HY L1s................... - C.Y 23:25:14 07/09/06 (1)
- B+ change is about 5V.. - C.Y 05:53:17 07/10/06 (0)
- Re: Problem with Toroid Power Transformers - drlowmu 00:25:30 07/07/06 (2)
- Re: Problem with Toroid Power Transformers - dave slagle 19:04:20 07/08/06 (1)
- Re: Problem with Toroid Power Transformers - drlowmu 16:17:14 07/09/06 (0)
- My post was not to agree or disagree but.. - C.Y 08:07:12 07/05/06 (0)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - keto 07:40:44 07/05/06 (1)
- Re: Ducati Caps......... - mach1 22:55:13 07/08/06 (0)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - Carl Gigun 23:58:09 07/04/06 (6)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - mach1 00:47:37 07/05/06 (5)
- What about........ - drlowmu 06:12:22 07/05/06 (4)
- For what it is worth... - Nickel Core 07:47:28 07/05/06 (3)
- Re: For what it is worth... - drlowmu 09:32:23 07/05/06 (2)
- Re: For what it is worth... - Nickel Core 09:35:11 07/05/06 (1)
- Re: For what it is worth... - drlowmu 09:47:19 07/05/06 (0)
- Nobody Claimed Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea . . . - Poindexter 22:16:43 07/04/06 (9)
- Re: Nobody Claimed Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea . . . - Jim McShane 06:26:27 07/05/06 (6)
- Good Point Jim - drlowmu 09:37:02 07/05/06 (5)
- Re: Good Point Jim - Jim McShane 15:57:30 07/05/06 (4)
- What is this trick? - Poindexter 10:07:06 07/06/06 (3)
- Re: Nobody Claimed Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea . . . - mach1 00:49:52 07/05/06 (0)
- Nice post !! - drlowmu 22:37:27 07/04/06 (0)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - Dave Davenport 22:01:28 07/04/06 (2)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - mach1 01:27:16 07/05/06 (0)
- Differences in-between RCA 5R4G tubes........ - Jimmy 06:32:49 07/05/06 (0)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - drlowmu 21:43:18 07/04/06 (2)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - mach1 01:39:29 07/05/06 (1)
- Re: If Low DCR Power Supplies are a Panacea......... - drlowmu 06:23:49 07/05/06 (0)