In Reply to: well, gee. . . posted by Bruce from DC on September 10, 2002 at 12:53:40:
or so it seems.YOU brought up the question of "Protect Moniker", not me. As I stated it has always been checked as far as I know(and still is). So, if this is a technical question and you want an answer, then please check this out and kindly inform us.I did not make this post as a "technical question", that is your assessment of it. IT IS NOT A TECHNICAL QUESTION. As far as I am concerned this is a question of why an obvious Rule Violation is allowed and why one Cannot receive a reasonable respose within a reasonable time period !!! How many times should I mention that I first brought this to whomever's attention on August 13,2002 ? There should be some system in writing as to how "comments" are to be handled. There is no such thing now. Every comment should receive a response, regardless of it's perceived merrit. If you are going to sh..can a comment because someone doesn't like its "tone" then put that in writing.
I too work but that shouldn't preclude a response in 4 weeks.
MEP
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: well, gee. . .you have an answer for everything don't you... - MEP14 13:27:43 09/10/02 (4)
- Since this isn't an audio-related topic . . - brewthunda 13:32:38 09/10/02 (2)
- Re: Since this isn't an audio-related topic . . you are right but.. - MEP14 13:51:02 09/10/02 (1)
- http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/support/ - brewthunda 13:54:06 09/10/02 (0)
- re: - Stephæn 17:20:15 09/10/02 (0)