In Reply to: Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. posted by chris_w on April 22, 2004 at 02:35:19:
Close your eyes...have someone ten feet away say something..point at them, open your eyes. If you are within 1 foot of their position, that is about 20 uSec L-R lateralization.You can tell the location of a pure tone up to about 1.2 Khz..beyond that, the ear to ear spacing is too wide.
If you use headphones, and apply a time shift to one ear signal, you will be able to discern a location in space where you envision the source to be..over 1.2 Khz, that falls apart.
By applying jitter to the pure tones, Nordmark showed that humans can distinguish L-R time delays all the way down to 1.5 uSec L-R differences.
The jitter was bipolar, meaning that the signal is alternately advanced and delayed by some specific amount. He found no improvement in discerning when the jitter exceeded 25 uSec, and found no enhancement for less than .2 uSec jitter., .6 uSec being what he deemed the threshold.
The 500-600Khz is just 1/time, time being 1.5 usec, so it would actually be 666 Khz. Loose numbers, of course, but certainly not the 50 usec/20Khz regime normally thought of in audio.
Cheers, John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - jneutron 07:10:52 04/22/04 (23)
- that may account for.... but quality ? - chris_w 10:41:01 04/22/04 (1)
- Re: that may account for.... but quality ? - jneutron 11:08:07 04/22/04 (0)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - Dan Banquer 09:49:43 04/22/04 (20)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - jneutron 11:11:01 04/22/04 (19)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - Dan Banquer 16:01:44 04/22/04 (18)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - jneutron 06:24:16 04/23/04 (17)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - Dan Banquer 11:40:27 04/23/04 (16)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - jneutron 12:39:17 04/23/04 (15)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - Jon Risch 21:48:28 04/23/04 (1)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - jneutron 06:08:21 04/26/04 (0)
- Re: How about a nope, nope, nope.. - Dan Banquer 12:56:09 04/23/04 (12)
- changed the subject line..finally - jneutron 13:10:51 04/23/04 (11)
- Re: changed the subject line..finally - Jon Risch 22:38:46 04/23/04 (1)
- Re: changed the subject line..finally - jneutron 06:25:22 04/26/04 (0)
- Re: changed the subject line...again! - Dan Banquer 13:40:07 04/23/04 (8)
- Re: changed the subject line...again! and again - jneutron 13:53:11 04/23/04 (7)
- Re: changed the subject line...again! and again - Dan Banquer 09:48:13 04/26/04 (6)
- Re: changed the subject line...again! and again - jneutron 10:19:17 04/26/04 (5)
- Re: changed the subject line...again! and again - Dan Banquer 11:08:12 04/26/04 (4)