In Reply to: Re: Frostbite Falls Audio inc posted by rick_m on April 18, 2007 at 01:28:55:
The paragraphs (from a magazine article in 1983) I quoted from were to show both that the controversy regarding directionality is still going on (in fact it resurfaced again late last year in Hi Fi News and was then taken up by New Scientist in January 2007) AND as an example of how people who have not experienced certain things (for example - directionality and cryogenic/freezing effects) then they are unable to understand what other people are talking about but people who HAVE experienced certain things recognise immediately what others are describing.The words of the magazine article I quoted from are not mine, however I salute the courage of the person writing them - and, they are still relevant today - 24 years later.
Regards,
May Belt.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Frostbite Falls Audio inc - May Belt 07:00:24 04/18/07 (1)
- New Scientist *sneered* at the very idea! How... scientific?... nt - clarkjohnsen 07:37:17 04/18/07 (0)