In Reply to: Re: Casual observations don’t cut it posted by tomservo on April 18, 2007 at 10:12:11:
The perfect strawman argument!! Unfortunately for your argument, we haven't been talking about "the acousitc waves as they enter the ear." You must not have been paying attention. We have been talking about what happens AFTER the acoustic waves enter the old noggin.Actually, the Princeton group (PEAR) publications (some portions of which I've posted) focus, almost exclusively, actually, on this aspect of sensory perception (including hearing) - i.e., the interaction of the brain with the physical environment (both conscious AND subconscious levels). Weren't you the one that pointed out PEAR in the first place?
~ Cheers
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "IF there is an effect that is large enough to be heard (as in altering the acoustic signal entering your ears..." - geoffkait 10:56:39 04/18/07 (9)
- Re: "IF there is an effect that is large enough to be heard (as in altering the acoustic signal entering your ears..." - tomservo 09:15:20 04/19/07 (8)
- Re: Addendum: PEAR and Giessen experiments - geoffkait 11:05:01 04/19/07 (6)
- Re: Addendum: PEAR and Giessen experiments - tomservo 11:44:27 04/19/07 (1)
- Re: "Some quotes from that paper that actually do sound like high end hifi" - geoffkait 13:06:42 04/19/07 (0)
- this makes everything simple and clear - tunenut 11:15:50 04/19/07 (3)
- Re: Well, maybe we can finally... - geoffkait 12:44:25 04/19/07 (2)
- that would be wise... - tunenut 12:52:48 04/19/07 (1)
- Re: "By disbelieving, do they negate (physical reality)?" - geoffkait 14:35:21 04/19/07 (0)
- Re: "IF there is an effect that is large enough to be heard (as in altering the acoustic signal entering your ears..." - geoffkait 10:40:21 04/19/07 (0)