In Reply to: Facts be damned then?... posted by Wellfed on March 21, 2007 at 07:07:54:
> Facts be damned then?...I am not damning facts. I am telling you that I am not particularly interested in a lot of emails on a topic I have looked at and have relatively little residual curiosity about.
> BTW, the issue of supposed date waffling was one of the levels you
> presented, was it not?Yes if it is about why you were waffling and why you did not send revised procedures in a timely manner (apart from the first obviously). No emails please, just what motivated you to do what you did.
> Pretty much a given, right?
Yes.
> I suppose JREF did me a favor then by portraying me as they
> themselves are. Spared me the trouble of failing a test I couldn't
> pass.It is very difficult to see any similarities between you and JREF. People reading the thread will see you failing to get on with the challenge and JREF not handling that particularly smoothly. But I do not think JREF did you any favours if the matter is not largely closed for you after all this time.
'Science' just marches on. ;-)
Science? You presumably wanted the money as I would if I could see a way to beat their challenge. JREF presumably wants the show business. Science would seem to have a very minor role.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Facts be damned then?... - andy19191 07:46:20 03/21/07 (8)
- Just kidding about the 'science'... - Wellfed 08:06:37 03/21/07 (7)
- Re: Just kidding about the 'science'... - andy19191 09:19:25 03/21/07 (6)
- Well Andy, here goes... - Wellfed 12:46:40 03/23/07 (5)
- Re: Well Andy, here goes... - andy19191 05:00:16 03/24/07 (4)
- Earth to Andy... - Wellfed 06:11:15 03/24/07 (3)
- The JREF?? You mean the JOKE-REF! - Posy Rorer 11:38:02 04/01/07 (2)
- Re: The JREF?? You mean the JOKE-REF! - andy19191 12:18:28 04/02/07 (1)
- You think showing up again on this thread lends you any credibility?... - Wellfed 23:51:24 04/02/07 (0)