|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: You just don't get it. The time for the technical discussion of this topic ended three and a half weeks ago posted by Soundmind on October 25, 2006 at 08:26:57:
I'm glad that our debate ended, because you stopped insulting me. However, I still don't know where I deliberately made a mistake in this case, unless it is in the structure of my statements that made it ambiguous in some way, and you jumped on the chance to use it against me.
Jneutron tried that recently with a typo of the temperature of SN62 solder. I appariently typed a 4 instead of a 3 in stating the melting temperature in degrees F. I got berated for it. I guess that, if controlling the soldering processes at my lab was a primary occupation of mine, at first glance, I would have noted it immediately. However, I only note the relative temperature of different solders, and I know that SN62 is one of the lowest melting temperature, eutectic, common solder formulations (you know, the kind that you can buy at the store), and therefore should be relatively easy to melt.
This kind of nit picking criticism doesn't convey any real information, but simply is used for harrassment of a specific individual that you disagree with. Talk about professional behavior! ;-)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You just don't get it. The time for the technical discussion of this topic ended three and a half weeks ago - john curl 11:49:57 10/25/06 (22)
- You can't change history that easily, silly. - jneutron 09:50:59 10/26/06 (0)
- John, John - E-Stat 08:49:08 10/26/06 (16)
- Re: John, John - john curl 10:01:53 10/26/06 (0)
- "We should rejoice in this continuing source of levity." There ya go! nt - clarkjohnsen 09:00:42 10/26/06 (14)
- I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - Soundmind 14:25:54 10/26/06 (13)
- No surprise here - E-Stat 05:43:43 10/27/06 (10)
- You would be best off..... - Soundmind 06:11:01 10/27/06 (9)
- Why certainly - E-Stat 06:31:04 10/27/06 (8)
- Re: Why certainly - Soundmind 06:48:35 10/27/06 (7)
- R-E-A-D---M-O-R-E---S-L-O-W-L-Y - E-Stat 06:59:23 10/27/06 (6)
- T-H-I-N-K---M-O-R-E---C-L-E-A-R-L-Y - Soundmind 07:12:42 10/27/06 (5)
- Still missing the point - E-Stat 07:52:56 10/27/06 (4)
- You're wrong as usual - Soundmind 08:36:01 10/27/06 (3)
- Exactly - E-Stat 09:01:24 10/27/06 (2)
- Re: Exactly - Soundmind 09:12:57 10/27/06 (1)
- Gotcha. Have no idea as to the meaning of "qualitative" (nt) - E-Stat 09:24:23 10/27/06 (0)
- Re: I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - john curl 21:35:32 10/26/06 (1)
- Re: I know I can, just by re-reading John Curl's "serious discussion" with May Belt about cables - Soundmind 05:22:06 10/27/06 (0)
- Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - Soundmind 12:36:06 10/25/06 (3)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - john curl 14:35:11 10/25/06 (2)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - Soundmind 07:26:27 10/26/06 (0)
- Re: Normally I'd ignore your obsessive focus on this topic but I have a question for you - john curl 15:46:13 10/25/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
