Additionally, the burden of proof would be on you - KlausR.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - (Yet) another Intellichip question (for Geoff, Clark, John) - KlausR. 03:09:26 04/01/05 (168)

I know it's April 1st - are you all serious? - Caymus 14:00:45 04/01/05 (0)

Small detail: no matter at what frequency, neither laser light nor anything that chip can emit... - orejones 08:45:53 04/01/05 (1)

Re: Small detail: no matter at what frequency, neither laser light nor anything that chip can emit... - geoffkait 13:14:37 04/01/05 (0)

Why bother?? - Robert Hamel 07:00:14 04/01/05 (2)

What's worst? - Jeff Lessard 15:29:43 04/01/05 (1)

Seals there real nt. - Robert Hamel 18:05:34 04/01/05 (0)

Klaus why do you even try? - Grillcloth 04:38:50 04/01/05 (118)

Re: Klaus why do you even try? - john curl 17:04:28 04/01/05 (76)

Leaving it alone - jbmcb 20:09:43 04/05/05 (15)

Re: Leaving it alone - KlausR. 23:58:43 04/05/05 (14)

Re: Leaving it alone - john curl 11:15:29 04/06/05 (13)

Listening tests - KlausR. 21:51:32 04/06/05 (11)

Re: Listening tests - john curl 01:50:07 04/07/05 (10)

What has Toole done lately? - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 21:26:37 04/07/05 (4)

Re: What has Toole done lately? - john curl 21:34:58 04/07/05 (3)

Definitions - jbmcb 06:59:59 04/08/05 (0)

Re: What has Toole done lately? - Mahatma Kane Jeeves 05:05:20 04/08/05 (1)

Not to forget the NRC facilities.. - KlausR. 05:40:43 04/08/05 (0)

And your point is ??????????? - KlausR. 02:48:20 04/07/05 (4)

Re: And your point is ??????????? - john curl 10:54:37 04/07/05 (3)

Re: And your point is ??????????? - KlausR. 04:50:48 04/08/05 (2)

Re: And your point is ??????????? - john curl 09:53:19 04/08/05 (1)

DBT/ABX - KlausR. 22:08:15 04/08/05 (0)

We agree on something - Ken Perkins 12:31:00 04/06/05 (0)

In the 1790s it was Phrenology... - Al Sekela 14:37:56 04/02/05 (35)

Re: In the 1790s it was Phrenology... - john curl 15:27:03 04/02/05 (34)

Why pass judgement at all? - Al Sekela 14:05:41 04/05/05 (33)

Re: Instant Expert - geoffkait 03:03:14 04/06/05 (32)

Not at all, Mr. Strawman. - Al Sekela 13:44:00 04/06/05 (31)

Re: I read, I digested... - geoffkait 14:23:32 04/06/05 (30)

Re: I read, I digested... - dave derrick 15:49:48 04/06/05 (29)

Re: A Simple Explanation - geoffkait 08:32:43 04/07/05 (28)

Re: A Simple Explanation - dave derrick 08:43:11 04/07/05 (27)

Re: A Simple Explanation - geoffkait 09:47:57 04/07/05 (0)

Maybe.... - pburant 09:19:35 04/07/05 (25)

Re: Maybe.... - geoffkait 10:48:20 04/07/05 (24)

The reality: Pride, Anger, and Sloth. - Al Sekela 14:19:03 04/07/05 (5)

Re: The reality - geoffkait 15:24:57 04/07/05 (0)

Re: The reality: Pride, Anger, and Sloth. - john curl 14:44:29 04/07/05 (3)

"Your facts are just plain wrong, Mr. Instant Expert." - Al Sekela 09:30:59 04/08/05 (2)

Re: "Your facts are just plain wrong, Mr. Instant Expert." - geoffkait 07:22:25 04/09/05 (0)

Re: "Your facts are just plain wrong, Mr. Instant Expert." - john curl 18:13:16 04/08/05 (0)

Uhhh... - pburant 11:37:35 04/07/05 (17)

Re: Uhhh, yourself... - geoffkait 12:22:16 04/07/05 (16)

But Geoff... - pburant 12:59:37 04/07/05 (11)

Re: But Geoff... - BS64 10:19:19 04/08/05 (7)

Re: woodwork - geoffkait 10:38:34 04/08/05 (6)

It's not funny - it's pretty sad... - pburant 11:32:10 04/08/05 (3)

Re: policy - geoffkait 12:41:44 04/08/05 (2)

Maybe you could quote the slander... - pburant 13:01:21 04/08/05 (1)

Re: "I'll buy a chip from you..." - geoffkait 03:38:37 04/09/05 (0)

as if I owe an explanation - BS64 10:45:06 04/08/05 (1)

Re: apologies - geoffkait 12:30:04 04/08/05 (0)

Re: Mr. Chip - geoffkait 15:05:38 04/07/05 (2)

Well, at least you admit there is a problem - pburant 06:05:30 04/08/05 (1)

Re: the problem is not mine, however... - geoffkait 07:59:46 04/08/05 (0)

Keptain....deflector shields just came on.....red alert..red alert..nt - jneutron 12:41:30 04/07/05 (3)

Haven't been here in a while.... - Commuteman 14:23:08 04/07/05 (2)

Re: Haven't been here in a while.... - Phil Tower 10:13:03 04/11/05 (0)

Hey, welcome back..missed ya..happy new year..nt - jneutron 06:00:46 04/08/05 (0)

As I've said below, we ARE open minded! - KlausR. 20:53:03 04/01/05 (23)

Re: World Wide Web - geoffkait 02:53:56 04/02/05 (22)

World Wide Web, not at all !!!!! - KlausR. 03:44:00 04/02/05 (21)

Re: Data Base - geoffkait 04:21:59 04/02/05 (20)

Re: Data Base - Joe II-V 00:16:53 04/05/05 (18)

Re: Breath - geoffkait 01:53:16 04/05/05 (17)

The joke is - Ken Perkins 05:07:33 04/05/05 (5)

Re: The joke is - Joe II-V 00:14:02 04/06/05 (1)

Re: The joke is - Ken Perkins 05:35:44 04/06/05 (0)

Re: The joker - geoffkait 06:32:06 04/05/05 (2)

That's just it - Ken Perkins 06:41:19 04/05/05 (1)

Re: That's just it - dave derrick 16:14:46 04/05/05 (0)

Niobium, again - KlausR. 04:15:50 04/05/05 (10)

Niobium and Q-dot lasers - KlausR. 07:59:34 04/05/05 (9)

Re: Niobium and Q-dot lasers - geoffkait 08:15:38 04/05/05 (8)

Noodle? Which noodle? - KlausR. 08:43:45 04/05/05 (7)

Re: Array - geoffkait 09:08:09 04/05/05 (6)

Niobium in arrays? - KlausR. 09:19:19 04/05/05 (5)

Re: Niobium in arrays? - geoffkait 10:41:34 04/05/05 (4)

Niobium, Redherringium, Whateverium - Al Sekela 13:52:29 04/05/05 (3)

CD uses Class 1 laser... - KlausR. 22:15:58 04/05/05 (0)

Re: "GSIC depends on flaws in ...construction" - geoffkait 14:35:43 04/05/05 (1)

Infrared energy - KlausR. 00:13:26 04/06/05 (1)

Patenting inlellectual property - KlausR. 04:42:13 04/02/05 (0)

Because I want to know... - KlausR. 05:27:31 04/01/05 (40)

Your personal (public) crusade has a flaw. - soulfood 08:16:54 04/01/05 (36)

This is the end, dadidada... (Doors, Apocalyse Now) - KlausR. 09:33:16 04/01/05 (35)

Klaus, please - CD 16:14:20 04/05/05 (34)

Re: Klaus, please - KlausR. 23:49:30 04/05/05 (33)

well, - CD 03:57:20 04/07/05 (32)

Well, well, quantum well ? - KlausR. 04:38:44 04/07/05 (31)

excess of woo - CD 13:18:05 04/07/05 (30)

I-chip and good vibrations - KlausR. 04:31:51 04/08/05 (29)

Re: I-chip and good vibrations - CD 13:48:32 04/08/05 (17)

Got your point:-) - KlausR. 07:41:18 04/09/05 (3)

Re: Got your point:-) - geoffkait 09:15:59 04/09/05 (2)

New cable technology - KlausR. 21:57:56 04/09/05 (1)

Cotton in cables - KlausR. 23:29:46 04/09/05 (0)

Re: ..."has anyone seen it fluoresce?" - geoffkait 05:34:35 04/09/05 (12)

Not being able to use normal light? - KlausR. 07:12:20 04/09/05 (11)

Re: normal light - geoffkait 09:39:51 04/09/05 (10)

Broadband absorption - KlausR. 21:37:32 04/09/05 (9)

Re: Narrowband emission - geoffkait 03:03:26 04/10/05 (4)

Re: Narrowband emission - KlausR. 03:26:19 04/10/05 (3)

Re: Beyond the Chip - geoffkait 03:44:51 04/10/05 (2)

The listener is part of the system... - KlausR. 04:02:39 04/10/05 (1)

Re: The listener - geoffkait 05:20:25 04/10/05 (0)

Additional question - KlausR. 02:30:10 04/10/05 (3)

Re: Additional question - geoffkait 03:57:31 04/10/05 (2)

Laser light scattering - KlausR. 04:09:14 04/10/05 (1)

Re: Laser light scattering - geoffkait 06:19:08 04/10/05 (0)

Re: you are correct! - geoffkait 04:50:37 04/08/05 (10)

Vibrations - KlausR. 05:07:23 04/08/05 (9)

Re: Vibrations - geoffkait 05:48:11 04/08/05 (8)

Re: Vibrations - KlausR. 07:00:22 04/08/05 (7)

Re: Vibrations - geoffkait 07:23:21 04/08/05 (6)

Seismic activities in the Netherlands - KlausR. 09:03:16 04/08/05 (5)

Re: Seismic activities in the Netherlands - geoffkait 10:15:10 04/08/05 (4)

Atlantis - KlausR. 11:34:53 04/08/05 (3)

Re: Atlantis - geoffkait 11:42:41 04/08/05 (2)

Pics in text - KlausR. 21:48:47 04/08/05 (1)

Re: Thanks! - geoffkait 04:42:12 04/09/05 (0)

Or even better, use a light bulb - KlausR. 05:50:54 04/01/05 (2)

Re: Because... - Jim Willis 06:12:20 04/01/05 (1)

Cheap photons ????? - KlausR. 10:16:53 04/01/05 (0)

Re: Standard tag - geoffkait 03:49:05 04/01/05 (42)

Re: Does this mean... - Jim Willis 06:07:34 04/01/05 (4)

Re: Does this mean... - geoffkait 13:20:14 04/01/05 (3)

So now you think infrared photons can penetrate aluminum? - Al Sekela 15:04:50 04/02/05 (2)

Re: tunneling - geoffkait 18:49:24 04/02/05 (1)

Tunneling is for particles. - Al Sekela 12:51:04 04/03/05 (0)

ok, next question - KlausR. 04:37:49 04/01/05 (34)

Additional question - KlausR. 05:48:23 04/01/05 (33)

Re: Additional question - geoffkait@verizon.net 07:42:10 04/01/05 (32)

Yes, but... - KlausR. 09:15:31 04/01/05 (31)

tend to agree... - geoffkait 10:55:04 04/01/05 (30)

What I see is... - KlausR. 20:29:38 04/01/05 (25)

Re: Coherent Mode - geoffkait 03:12:03 04/02/05 (18)

Come on Geoff, refresh your memory! - KlausR. 03:32:57 04/02/05 (17)

Re: Come on Geoff, refresh your memory! - geoffkait 04:34:00 04/02/05 (16)

Semantic argument, bad habit, sorry - KlausR. 05:59:16 04/02/05 (15)

Re: Semantic argument, bad habit, sorry - geoffkait 06:45:48 04/02/05 (14)

Too late for a patent anyway - KlausR. 20:36:47 04/02/05 (13)

Additionally, the burden of proof would be on you - KlausR. 21:35:46 04/02/05 (12)

Re: Additionally, the burden of proof would be on you - Steve Eddy 20:27:25 04/03/05 (2)

Re: Straw Man Alert! - geoffkait 02:09:01 04/05/05 (0)

US 5,487,057 - KlausR. 06:26:28 04/04/05 (0)

Re: Burden of Proof and Demo - geoffkait 05:41:23 04/03/05 (1)

Too technical is no problem for us - KlausR. 06:16:50 04/03/05 (0)

Re: patent - geoffkait 05:25:29 04/03/05 (6)

Re: patent - KlausR. 06:28:07 04/03/05 (5)

Re: Bias - geoffkait 08:23:49 04/03/05 (4)

Re: Bias - KlausR. 09:56:19 04/03/05 (3)

Re: Bias - geoffkait 10:40:40 04/03/05 (2)

DBT and Bias - KlausR. 21:50:56 04/03/05 (1)

Re: DBT and Bias - geoffkait 03:49:40 04/04/05 (0)

What I further see is... - KlausR. 20:38:32 04/01/05 (5)

Re: What I further see is... - geoffkait 03:05:02 04/02/05 (4)

Condition of the CD - KlausR. 03:18:07 04/02/05 (3)

Re: Condition of the CD - geoffkait 05:04:43 04/02/05 (2)

Re: Condition of the CD - KlausR. 05:39:31 04/02/05 (1)

Re: all the answers - geoffkait 05:51:35 04/02/05 (0)

Re: tend to agree... - Steve Eddy 15:46:53 04/01/05 (3)

Email disabled? - Joe Murphy Jr 22:29:43 04/06/05 (0)

Re: excellent Q - geoffkait 16:23:27 04/01/05 (1)

Too bad it wasn't followed up with an excellent A. nt - Steve Eddy 17:30:29 04/01/05 (0)

Oh right, this is April Fool's isn't it! :) You had me there for a min! Ha ha ha.. nice one! - Steve Cortez 03:53:02 04/01/05 (1)

I aim to please =:-) (nt) - geoffkait 04:34:08 04/01/05 (0)

Follow Ups

Additionally, the burden of proof would be on you - KlausR. 21:35:46 04/02/05 (12)

Re: Additionally, the burden of proof would be on you - Steve Eddy 20:27:25 04/03/05 (2)

Re: Straw Man Alert! - geoffkait 02:09:01 04/05/05 (0)

US 5,487,057 - KlausR. 06:26:28 04/04/05 (0)

Re: Burden of Proof and Demo - geoffkait 05:41:23 04/03/05 (1)

Too technical is no problem for us - KlausR. 06:16:50 04/03/05 (0)

Re: patent - geoffkait 05:25:29 04/03/05 (6)

Re: patent - KlausR. 06:28:07 04/03/05 (5)

Re: Bias - geoffkait 08:23:49 04/03/05 (4)

Re: Bias - KlausR. 09:56:19 04/03/05 (3)

Re: Bias - geoffkait 10:40:40 04/03/05 (2)

DBT and Bias - KlausR. 21:50:56 04/03/05 (1)

Re: DBT and Bias - geoffkait 03:49:40 04/04/05 (0)