In Reply to: Thanks Bill posted by Coffeecupman on October 18, 2006 at 23:47:34:
CCM,I made a typo in my previous post - the suffixes are in alphabetical order, in terms of supposed increasing quality; -J, -Q, -T. The information about the higher-spec suffixes came to me just yesterday, from a 3rd party. This is why I use the term 'lore'; verification is required before acting on this info.
Also, keep in mind that while the military optimized tubes for various reasons, sonics was not among them. If you're going to pay more for a higher spec, make sure that it's actually ruggedness or service life you are getting, and not tightly controlled heater current, operation at 30,000 feet, extended temperature range, or some other essentially pointless optimization.
The production dates on these tubes extend back to the early 1980s, or even into the 1970s. Long term storage can be an issue, if the tubes were not well protected. Pins and wires can corrode (both internal and external to the base), base cement can fail, and so forth. In my view, a batch of pristine -J would be preferable to a dodgy looking batch of a higher spec.
The current batch of Chinese 6N5P being shipped by Atma-Sphere are the -J suffix. Our prime requirement was that the tubes have some level of mil-spec ruggedness rating, above and beyond civilian / industrial. To be frank, they have well exceeded our expectations. If the -J are this good, one wonders what there is left to be gained from higher specs.
Over the years, batch quality has varied somewhat with the Russian tubes. The most recent batches of Svetlana 6N13S were the best (certainly the most consistent) I can recall working with, and these Chinese 6N5P-J are no worse.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Thanks Bill - Legendre 16:34:29 10/19/06 (1)
- Re: Thanks Bill - jb0194 17:20:16 10/19/06 (0)