In Reply to: You are still confused posted by Charles Hansen on December 21, 2005 at 19:52:19:
Charles, so far you've accused me of somehow "missing a point", being wrong, have reading comprehension issues, "confused" and who knows what else. So who's stooping to insults?Your suggestion that what's documented in a patent has not implemented is rather fanciful and contrived. Perhaps it is you who need to prove this assertion? Or is it simply because you can't bring yourself to admit you were wrong?
*** I would instead suggest trying to find some factual evidence that supports your claims. ***
Maybe you should follow your own advice?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: You are still confused - Christine Tham 00:01:40 12/22/05 (10)
- Taking a page from W - Charles Hansen 09:11:58 12/22/05 (9)
- Re: Taking a page from W - Christine Tham 11:54:11 12/22/05 (8)
- I guess we agree on one thing - Charles Hansen 20:03:13 12/22/05 (7)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Christine Tham 15:25:13 12/23/05 (6)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Charles Hansen 20:16:22 12/23/05 (5)
- Re: I guess we agree on one thing - Christine Tham 00:38:47 12/24/05 (4)
- Once again you are wrong - Charles Hansen 11:00:41 12/24/05 (3)
- I don't think you know the meaning of the word "wrong", since you are not applying it correctly - Christine Tham 12:25:41 12/24/05 (2)
- You have gone beyond obstinence... - Charles Hansen 18:49:44 12/24/05 (1)
- Sorry, but you haven't really given any evidence - Christine Tham 22:47:18 12/24/05 (0)